Infoseite // from after effects and premiere issue interlaced dv

Frage von monx:


Hello
yes I know the question has certainly already answered 100 times but could not find the answer synonymous.

how do I do if I want to interlaced material from

Adobe Premiere (which is the unterscied btw dv and microsoft dv avi, micr. avi)
and
aftereffects
(which field sequence, as is the effects of)

then burn it to dvd to play and s.fernseher

thanks for help



Antwort von Markus:

Hello,

as regards the relationship APP / AE / fields look once linked in the first post. There, the approach is explained.

What is your video field sequence on the right system, you can (have) You find out yourself. For DV recording is typically "lower field first", but this can vary depending on hardware synonymous. My PC would like to start due to the Matrox video card, for example, "upper field".

Through trial and error you can find the correct field sequence but out easily.

Links:
" Video has blurred to the output from AE
" What field order when and where?



Antwort von prem:

hello, thanks for the tips

but I still ask one thing:

When joining the fields image information is lost, technically speaking, this means you have a loss of quality.
stefan says that in the linked thread of you

does not come to the art? if I see for example the two images gives the lie just above the 2, but half of the amount so full pixel * info, right?

lg
david



Antwort von Markus:

"David" wrote: does not come to the art? if I see for example the two images gives the lie just above the 2, but half of the amount so full pixel * info, right?
No, just the way that does not come out because the two belong together fields are indeed limited by 1 / 50 s differ. When moving content would then sign off unwanted effects.



Antwort von ich = monx:

hello, yes, the fields are shifted in time, but if only the fields übereinanderlegt but no visual info is lost, right?



Antwort von prem:

"I = Monx" wrote: hello, yes, the fields are shifted in time, but if only the fields übereinanderlegt but no visual info is lost, right?

I believe that with your understanding of half-frames are you still a little on the wrong track. Maybe it will help you look next to the many described in the board again on a purely computerized Tip: http://www.edv-tipp.de/docs/einstiegsseite.htm
There you will find the "Video to DVD / SVCD" under "The resolution" still a beautiful and striking description relating to Field.

As always synonymous, your original question was, how you can get Adobe AE and Premiere interlaced material.
You have to simply export (settings) / movie set to render interlaced. As long as your source is DV you lie with high probability with "lower field" right. Whether your source material is interlaced or progressive, AE and Premiere, are then interlaced to spend on each case.
The source material is progressive, does not distinguish the fields in time.
Conversely, the assembly of half-frames interlaced s.Television no loss of quality. Interlaced and progressive are just two different techniques () about how different painting techniques. There is ultimately no preference whether you picture your interlaced or progressive burn to DVD: The normal player ggf the interlaced picture before printing, the flat screen that can only reflect de-interlaced images, de-interlaced ggf the signal from the player.
Nevertheless, you should render interlaced, otherwise you can not replay the final film onto tape (it is the one you have, the progressive records).



Antwort von monx:

Hello,

when I'm s.holzweg then please tell what synonymous s.meinem thoughts is not true!

I do not understand is why more and if you are not linked with a meaningful agrees. instead of being criticized specifically responded daruf /.

: P so what I'll now synonymous:

100fps:
Because of this time intermix (1 frame = time1 + time2) it is impossible to:

1)
deinterlace a frame
AND 2) keep 25 frames / second
AND 3) keep the super high quality (= all information of a picture).

Impossible. You will have to alter s.least one of those points. Except, when there was no motion.

ask again, what is true s.meiner not meaningful??

for the other info, I'm obviously very grateful
lg



Antwort von Markus:

"monx" wrote: I do not understand is why he always linked [...] rather than criticize specific answer daruf /.
The reason is simple, but it makes no sense that I copy the text and it will add here. I think it's better to give you the source directly s.The hand, so you you can obtain synonymous with the information that go through your question out.

So synonymous of my Page is a link:
Wenn du nicht verstehst...

"I = Monx" wrote: Wenn du nicht verstehst...

... yes, the fields are time-shifted, but if only the fields übereinanderlegt but no visual info is lost, right? Wenn du nicht verstehst...


As far as I made your question in identifying das least true as long as no software misinterpreted something and as long as no intentional or unintentional deinterlacing takes place (approximately) as when importing into AE without manual interpretation of the footage.



Antwort von monx:

even with the quote that's true, but if I then (you know) that the others have a flaw then I send him not to look but he just tell.
well, I sehs halt so

Einstein: if they have not been able to explain to her granny sies did not understand myself.

Quote: David has written the following:
does not come to the art? if I see for example the two images gives the lie just above the 2, but half of the amount so full pixel * info, right?

No, just the way that does not come out because the two belong together fields are indeed limited by 1 / 50 s differ. When moving content would then sign off unwanted effects.


which here has the answer with the question to do?? so please

lg
david






Antwort von Stefan:

"Anonymous" wrote: hello, thanks for the tips

but I still ask one thing:

When joining the fields image information is lost, technically speaking, this means you have a loss of quality.
stefan says that in the linked thread of you

does not come to the art? if I see for example the two images gives the lie just above the 2, but half of the amount so full pixel * info, right?

lg
david

Taking the issue to a gold balance, one has to say: Yes, it depends on the species.

Fields so you can weave together into a full screen that the original image information is retained. The time information is then also contain what may be seen s.den waves good at moving edges. You can synonymous herausextrahieren from such full-screen images, the original picture-and time info again if one assumes given certain information such as the frame rate.

Even next to the extreme, one must note that you must work with one to uncompressed or lossless codec. Should not that be the case, through the manipulation of the codec is inevitably influenced s.Vollbild irreversibly image information and time information.

But why is irrelevant in the case of AE / AP? It's simple: the joining together of half-frames into a full-AE / AP not to make the above method.

AE / AP trying to put together if they are invited to the best possible while using the full screen and deinterlacing with interpolation means that these frames can no longer divide on the previous half-frames.

Yes, there are applications where you want to have frames. But the link given in the Procedure AP-fields = Merge / deinterlacing Edit => AE-frames = Disconnect / interlace => AP-fields, I do not think it made sense.

What can you do, I can not see your question and she reads for a query of the technical details under the links given or are in the manuals of good s.sich Adobe nachlesbar more than satisfactory.

Good luck
The thick Stefan