Frage von hubse:
Hi,
I must here reading somewhere (I searched, I finds no more) that one top-field-mixing, and not bottom-field-material.
If one reflects a Picture or or on their head (for example, if you turn the camera with the Steadycam to come close s.den ground and then cutting the Picture must turn), I then made a bottom-top-field field done? Do we get to problems?
Regards,
Martin
Antwort von Immedia:
Who else could be problematic left-field and right-field side in an accidental shooting.
Antwort von tommyb:
@ Hubs
Interesting approach. Habs I just watched with Avisynth and yes - change de fact - in the Fields.
In itself it is not bad to use Top and bottom together, but should the editing program such material synonymous recognize as such, and can adapt.
Alternatively, the material can be synonymous 50p deinterlace and then WORKMANSHIP (thus progressive material is golden so:)
Antwort von WoWu:
Really interesting approach, because a NLE s.wann respond if I have a frame, for example, only a few degrees incline, the line scanned so new ... so why not at 180 °? Hmmm.
Antwort von Jott:
On the lines following changes certainly nothing when you turn in the timeline and footage used. Which always remains as one set to match the codec that is synonymous when a clip is placed on the head.
Antwort von WoWu:
Habs I just watched with Avisynth and yes - change de fact - in the Fields. We believe once the practitioner? :-)
Antwort von tommyb:
[Code: 1: f1f2e1054e] AviSource ("hierdateirein.avi") # # s.besten DV-AVI
AssumeBFF () # # assume that Bottom Field First, because DV
bob () [/ code: 1: f1f2e1054e]
So is normal.
And here the cross-check:
[Code: 1: f1f2e1054e] AviSource ("hierdateirein.avi") # # s.besten DV-AVI
AssumeBFF () # # assume that Bottom Field First, because DV
Turn180 ()
bob () [/ code: 1: f1f2e1054e]
Ooops ...
And yet the fact remains that an editing program which bypasses all synonymous with reasonable half-frames twist and turn in, and rotate it right.
The field order can be had simply synonymous again "turn back", in which one wegcroppt above a line (1px) and appends s.Picture below black.
Eg like this:
[Code: 1: f1f2e1054e] AviSource (hierdateirein.avi ") # # s.besten DV-AVI
AssumeBFF () # # assume that Bottom Field First, because DV
Turn180 ()
converttorgb32 ()
crop (0,1,0,0)
AddBorders (0,0,0,1)
ConvertToYV12 ()
bob () [/ code: 1: f1f2e1054e]
or even this:
[Code: 1: f1f2e1054e] AviSource ("hierdateirein.avi") # # s.besten DV-AVI
AssumeBFF () # # assume that Bottom Field First, because DV
Turn180 ()
swapfields ()
be AssumeBFF () # # must be because the internal field is synonymous last day in Avisynth
bob () [/ code: 1: f1f2e1054e]
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
Take prefer the material as DV and XDCAM EX footage, be it at the XDCAM timeline and you look at the lines, then you will see that the lines for the computer hardware to be adapted. The splicing can be, we cut and our colleagues for Pro7 and RTL productions such material again and again s.der AVID together, that is normal everyday TV and the TV channels are satisfied, ie the material is broadcast quality!
Antwort von WoWu:
DV and XDCAM is clear, but here it is a question that is both DV material, but once in Scanreverse.
@ TommyB
To me the workflow is not completely clear, I would understand it but you. Can you say again, as you have the picture rotated, until you have tested it?
Even with the one inserted row is clear.
I am concerned to learn about just how the frame looked like, the
turn has led to
180 instructions.
Quite apart from the fact that such problems would indeed be synonymous with the movie occur adapter users, the Picture without reverse scan are eligible if they are mixed with other pictures.
