Frage von charletto:
Hello,
times wanted to ask whether it is advisable, Sky or on my UV Optics draufzuetzen - but without quality loss! If so, what can you recommend or knows someone randomly diameter for Fujinon Zoom Lens Th16x5.5BRM?
Thank you very much
LG &
Charly
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Diameter for Fujinon ... Th16x5.5BRM? ... Should be 82mm, but can guarantee I will not.
Antwort von WoWu:
You need Charly 82er.
Sky is unnecessary UV only if you use strong ND searched.
Otherwise I would everything from the optical beam path let out. Each glass reduces the quality and if it is unnecessary (and these are Sky and UV under normal conditions) it is still synonymous cheaper.
And if so, then not out of the corner store.
Antwort von charletto:
I was more concerned with the protection, in HDV kennste Chen Krümmel any dust on the lens, so in the first place. Although Microfasertuch Use for cleaning, but again and again - especially when a lot of wind - well, that's just my question was what would s.besten ....
LG
Charly
Antwort von WoWu:
Well, but then you have the dirt on the lens ... and next because he is gone, it will be even more visible.
Use the lens cover .... this helps. Or Get a really good glass, as thin as possible, preferably from a neutral optical properties.
When HD is really in each glass Strahlenweg from.
Locking the Camera s.einen good times monitor s.and times then put a. Or make two times the "quasi" Identical pictures and put them in the computer on each other to create a AB comparison to make. You'll be surprised you, what s.partiellen blurs and lighting effects added. The light loss through the glass, you can still capture the gain, although it is synonymous with darkness for each db is grateful ... but the fineness detail you get with HD will never again.
Antwort von charletto:
Ok,
this is a good tip, thank you, Wolfgang and still nen schönen Abend!
LG
Charly
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hello,
It is not that the UV radiation on the chip takes a little time on the colors could fade? So not as dust, but as a protection for the camera ...
Otherwise is clear what the two of you mentioned it. I would prefer a pole-recommended, but always on the application!
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von WoWu:
Hello Constantin
Actually, all the sensors already deposited UV and require no additional UV. Because this is no absolute UV protection and together with the flow curve of ND filters enhanced UV radiation s.Sensor may occur based exposure control s.nicht visible light and regulates the entire range (including visible light) down. This will see the pictures and little soft from durchgesättigt.
Hence my recommendation, UV only in conjunction with NDS to use.
But Pol-change per synonymous gewöhnungsbedürftig the visual impression .... but it must be synonymous like ...
