Frage von Der Videot:
Hello!
If anyone, the now infamous article should not know: http://www2.tomshardware.de/cpu/20060427/index.html
Unfortunately, I do not know him too well from micht with hardware or even Overcloking ... Therefore I would be very interested in your opinion!
If the processor overclocked so useful for video editing and-cut?
To pay for something? Or practice one's electricity bill to ruin?
What say you about this?
mfg.videot
Antwort von curtis:
Good day!
The potential of the CPU is impressive. If I had to make up my mind tomorrow for a new calculator, would be the D805 is still not s.Bord.
1. The tremendous over-implementation costs.
2. From 4 GHz range even the best air cooler is no longer so must be a watercooling ago. A good quality system in order to cool the CPU cost at least 150 euros.
3. In case of complex compositing work is the calculator under constant load, hours and hours. The processor seems to be overclocked up to the maximum, thus vulnerable to a defect in the vastness is higher. Note only the temperature reached values ...
I have in my calculator currently have an AMD X2 clocked at 2.5 GHz 3800 +. In the comparison charts of Article synonymous appears on the X2 4800 +. Something about its lower level of my CPU. Instantaneous a cost of ~ $ 300. At no time temperature rises above 50 degrees. So I am completely satisfied.
Overclocking s.sich I find a very useful thing because it can really save a lot of money herewith. Importantly, it is precisely the area of operation of the PC's into line with the action taken. A CPU is running constantly s.der limits of its capabilities, I think that the DV editing is not useful, either because you installed a reliable cooling system.
Gruß, Philipp
Antwort von camworks:
you need not go to 4.1 ghz. eg if you overclock to 3.8 ghz, the whole still remains in the frame, the per cent, and thermal reserves. Plus, the D805 so thermal Dingenskirchen version 2, the per cent, if too much heat then drove a bit slower.
