Infoseite // poor quality in DV Recording



Frage von Bobdilan:


Hello,
'm still a bloody Beginners in "Video Output".
've Searched everywhere but I do not become smarter.
I have the following problem:
If I were in my Ulead MSP 6.5 Project on Mini DV issue is the poor image quality and the sound sounds really horrible an.Woran could be the reason?
If I save a movie in MPEG quality is okay, but I can not film on Mini DV export.
Had thought I would need a better codec. If yes, what
is the best?
Thank you in advance !!!!!

Space


Antwort von Chris H.:

The top contribution is of me.
I'm probably just kicked out irgentwie :-)

Space


Antwort von StefanS:

"Anonymous" wrote:
If I were in my Ulead MSP 6.5 Project on Mini DV issue is the poor image quality and the sound sounds really horrible to.


What will output and how the user?

Greeting
Stefan

Space


Antwort von Bobdilan:

Hi Stefan,
Thank you for your reply.
I mean when I rendered my Project
via Firewire to my DV camcorder.
With Ulead MSP 6.5 means:
"Export"> "MS-DV Recording
The quality of the transferred film is then
very bad.

Space


Antwort von StefanS:

That can not be.

When:

The "Studio" from MiniDV camcorder to your PC via Firewire is made.
The "right" project settings available.
The "rendering" of the movie in the timeline, only the effects and transitions involved.
No consistent effects were applied.
The view of the camera work transferred s.TV turn was made.

Please tell me which of the above points when you are not correct.

However, there is a possibility that with time I can imagine.

The 6 versions had a bug in the Ulead DV template, which consequently, as far as I devise, not corrected by Ulead, namely:

The PAL DV template was set to fullscreen. And now when the raw material correctly interlaced existed, it was with this template entirely de-interlaced. I can imagine that if the tape was played back, maybe it trembles when playing the tape of the Camera s.TV huge.

I can not judge because you do not write how you define quality miserable. You write again not synonymous, where and how and what and what you look at the miserable quality anschaust after the film again on a tape in the camera is.

Please explain yourself clearly, even churlish, or with other words:
Explain it to me as if I were an infant, or else my crystal ball is always so moldy.

Greeting
Stefan

Space


Antwort von Chris H.:

Hello Stefan.
Thanks for the tip that the rendering of
Timeline only applies to transitions and effects.
I now have the "Scenalyzer" runtergeladen
and then captured. The quality is now much better luck! :-)
Thanks Again!

Space


Antwort von StefanS:

????????????????????????????

Greeting
Stefan

Space


Antwort von Markus:

"Chris H." wrote: ... "Scenalyzer" downloaded and there captured. The quality is now much better luck! :-)
A clear case: There were probably the settings when capturing in Ulead MSP wrong.

PS: Stefan, you can close your mouth again. ;-)

Space


Antwort von StefanS:

Markus, I see it as synonymous. I just do not understand why the people in the middle of the solution process abort if they are a quick and dirty solution found, instead of the real problem to get to the bottom, to understand and in the future.

But there comes again I probably still not quite gone spill idealism and faith in human reason s.die through. I will probably quite quickly back off.

Until then the next time ...

Greeting
Stefan

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash