Logo Logo
directory schraeg
Camcorders· Cinema-Kamera· Computers· GPU· Video-DSLR· accessories
Compositing· Color correction· DV Editing

Shooting· Sound
/// News
Are RED's RAW patents invalidated?

Are RED's RAW patents invalidated?

[09:21 fri,16.August 2019   by ]    

bildThere is probably no sign of the summer slump at RED, quite the opposite. In the next few weeks, the American camera manufacturer is unlikely to be able to rest on its laurels. It started a few weeks ago with the "printer ink reproach", RED sells cheap standard components off the peg with a more than stately surcharge.

Then Andrew Reid of EOSHD spoke a few days ago and reported that years ago RED urged him to sign a kind of journalistic muzzle under threat of a fine of 70,000 dollars.

And in the eagerness of this discussion, Personal View now turned up a document that proves that Apple filed a very detailed motion with the US Patent and Trademark Office in May of this year to nullify the infamous RED-RAW patents. Be it out of triviality or because of Prior Art.

The RED-RAW patents in question have been highly controversial for some time and are rumored to prevent many camera manufacturers from implementing compressed RAW codecs for moving images. Because to date, RED has demanded corresponding license fees for this.

Jeromy Young of Atomos, for example, openly told the last NAB that they are now paying royalties to RED, while Blackmagic is quite obviously trying to get around them by partial debayering in the camera at BRAW.

But why is Apple taking this legal step? The reason is probably to be found in ProRES RAW. Apple would certainly like to see this in-house format in more cameras, but few manufacturers would want to transfer a lot of money to RED.

That this might further burden the friendship between RED and Apple is almost obvious. So meanwhile the exclusive RED Camera-Scarlett Set has disappeared from the Apple Store again. And only in January RED publicly demanded a fair deal with Nvidia from Apple.
In addition RED has nearly no counter pressure means opposite Apple in the hand, since Apple does not manufacture cameras, which could violate RED patents. Therefore the legal risk for Apple is limited to the Honoar for a few lawyers and the expert who formulated the application.

Link more infos at bei www.personal-view.com

deutsche Version dieser Seite: Werden REDs RAW Patente für ungültig erklärt?


  Vorige News lesen Nächste News lesen 
bildGoPro Hero 8 geleakt -- mehr fps und Zubehör? bildGerüchte verdichten sich: wann kommt die DJI Mavic Mini?

related news:1E0RED sells used RED cameras // IBC 2019 17.September 2019
smallHD Cine 7 Monitor: Control for RED DSMC2 cameras via Pay-Upgrade // IBC 2019 12.September 2019
New RED Ranger models - now also available for purchase // NAB 2019 10.September 2019
Cartoni RED LOCK tripod with interchangeable 75 / 100 mm holder and 60 kg(!) payload // IBC 2019 20.August 2019
And RED teasert further: Komodo camera owns SDI and Canon RF mount 17.August 2019
RED teasert Komodo: is a RED Cine compact camera coming? 30.July 2019
Everything will be better: RED announces Hydrogen Two and camera module 24.July 2019
alle Newsmeldungen zum Thema Red

[nach oben]

Archiv Newsmeldungen


September - August - July - June - May - April - March - February - January

December - November - October - September - August - July - June - May - April - March - February - January



















deutsche Version dieser Seite: Werden REDs RAW Patente für ungültig erklärt?

last update : 18.September 2019 - 15:02 - slashCAM is a project by channelunit GmbH- mail : slashcam@--antispam:7465--slashcam.de - deutsche Version