Here is a brief overview of the latest articles with insights, opinions, discoveries and Lernenswertem Final Cut Pro X. First, the state of the discussions around Final Cut Pro X: The upgraded into a dialogue with the NYT authors David Pogue and Apple&s FAQ, which came Cutter Richard Harrington Pogues pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06 / 24/the-quarrel-over-final-cut-continues / (final product) as a victory: there he explains the many comments of professional editors have persuaded him to see that Apple would have built crap and FCPX not ready for the professional market. Harrington&s version of the Pogues FCPX FAQs is even more multi-faceted lack of further knowledge, but what features really gehen&oder and should thereby (including desperate for broadcast editors) are always interesting. The wide range of reactions explains this article with the diversity of target groups of FCPX - some others with the degree of dependence on Apple and Voreingeweihtheit in the product launch. Here again (in summary) magazine.creativecow.net/article/final-cut-pro-x-whats-missing-for-some-pros which lacks the professional users of all functionality in FCPX. Some authors speak of biggest mistake Apples for years, others disappointed Cutter lfhd.net/2011/06/ 24/fcp-x-so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-fish (goodbye) / long term by Apple itself, others are not willing to see it despite the shortcomings, especially thefinalrewrite .net/2011/06/24/sanity-in-the-fcp-x-debacle / (promises) of a new workflow features, and speed of FCPX and hope for repair by Apple. The FCP (since 1.0) Veteran Josh Mellick attracts a very www.dvcreators.net/what-does-the-guy-who-led-the-original-final-cut-pro-revolution-think-of -the-final-cut-pro-x-releases / (depth and critical analysis) of Apple&s FCPX product introduction (some say even debacle), its origin and gives his prediction about the future of FCPX (and goes further bets even a .) The absence of external plug-ins is probably Apple&s own fault - their makers seem Plugin Maker pissed because no prior information forums.creativecow.net/readpost/335/5048 to (be angry) because they received no advance information from Apple have and could therefore deliver to the start of FCPX any new versions of their plugins. Andrew Reid still exists, according to no SDK, he says, however, many plugins should be sent one-step recompiles again be operational. FCPX = iMovie 10? The PVC-author Steve Hullfish believes the provideocoalition.com/index.php/shullfish/story/proof_that_fcp_x_is_really_just_imovie_-_directly_from_apple/ found (evidence) to the moderate version FCPX have actually iMovie is the successor of discoveries :-) evidence for the existence of (not yet active) the ability of such FCPX blog.nicedissolve.com/2011/06/is-python-the-future-of-fcpx-workflow hope / (run Pythonscritpe) or with the Open EXR and DPX formats deal allows for future versions. FCPX to know who already has the help of the following http:/ / library.creativecow.net / tutorials / finalcutprox (video tutorials) by Creative Cow when scouting new features or rediscovery of old familiar FCP7 functionalities. And the following (as this 6-parts series so far) lead a beautiful in the library.creativecow.net/articles/mcauliffe_kevin/FCPX-1 / video-tutorial (new paradigms) and basic functions of working with FCPX. And here is a detailed introduction to the form of a FCPX article. But this advance should installation instructions from Apple to be considered FCPX, 5 Motion, Compressor 5th Who in the installation due to lack of hardware support (such as a lack of OpenGL graphics card) desperately, is perhaps the 9to5
FCPX FAQs is even more multi-faceted lack of further knowledge, but what features really gehen&oder and should thereby (including desperate for broadcast editors) are always interesting. The wide range of reactions explains 
