Frage von c.herf:
Hello,
I would like to see finally a semi-professional camcorder growth. No Ausgeborge more. Had before so short and documentary film. The latter should then be broadcast synonymous. Now make me some questions, not HDV or HDV for example. In any case there should be an opportunity to record in 25p. The lens should be quite weitwinklig, "professional" audio (XLR) an option. Light sensitive Besides, I would not necessarily be on artificial lighting supply.
In short, the Panasonic DVX100BE, the Canon XH A1 or Canon XM2. The latter seems to be a little out of line to dance but is also conveniently has true 16:9, 25p, etc. .. So I ask for advice in particular whether or not HDV. If TV wants to produce material, HDV is not already present as future-proof? What are the main differences of these cameras ... etc.
Thanks in advance ....
Antwort von PowerMac:
The XM2 is not a true 16:9 and no real 25p, and no HD.
The DVX has the best handling and the best optics, but no HD.
The XH A1 has a bad handling, poor optics, a great picture and HD.
I can give you only the last recommendation. In HD and 16:9 is today and certainly in two years, nothing more. Even the Ö.-R. radiate almost exclusively of 16:9.
Antwort von Login_vergessen:
Meal,
The XM2 has a 4:3 chip and is NOT a true 16:9. The Pana has XLR connections and 25P, but SD. For the Canon, I can say nothing, but if your purpose for HDV is an issue, why not ...
16:9 may DVX100BE ge "squeezt" or "letterbox".
Antwort von Login_vergessen:
Ok, Patrick was faster ... ;-)
Antwort von c.herf:
Is there ne good as HDV 25p + 16:9 + solution for under 3000, - ¬?
Antwort von PowerMac:
Yes, the XH A1 uses;)
Antwort von c.herf:
Maybe I could, because I mainly want to shoot documentary material on 25p renounce? Is not perhaps camera solutions "far" in 3000, - ¬? Was synonymous with the vx2100 geliebäugelt. Consumer camcorder with the fairly good reputation. But not a HDV. Hmmm
