Frage von aight8:
I have a bit of the stuttering with my XH A1 - especially in movement - set apart.
Here I encountered again after a long s.die Deshaker I tested a long time ago.
According to the videos, with such software can be excellent but small jerky movements, or even step "touch up" just gone.
What do you think of this software? Can they not help a crazy and even a cheap solution to Steadycams be softer? If such solutions are synonymous used commercially?
Antwort von tommyb:
If any such software is suitable as a support to the recent blunders from the video to get.
The problem namely, the motion blur which is especially strong in shaky footage. The Deshaker compensated although the shift, but can not compensate for the blur and then everything looks like jelly. The only way is with a very fast shutter speeds to work - but who wants that ...
In addition, you lose by the "zoom in" a little s.Resolution - is the picture scaled to compensate for bleed edges.
Antwort von aight8:
Okei I'm driving not at the stuttering but the "steps" smoothen. So much so that it really looks like one of Steadicam. Succussed pictures are really hard to handle and look after the Deshaking not synonymous better. Just "different" bad.
With a muck of ~ 100 could prevent the little blur that happen when you run. But why would you not recommend lower shutter? The Aperture I try anyway because of the DOF to keep the 2f. Instead of using a low shutter ND is better anyway?
Antwort von Mink:
Do you have access to such a Deshaker software? Give it a whirl and the limits are quickly apparent.
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
But why would you not recommend lower shutter? The Aperture I try anyway because of the DOF to keep the 2f. Instead of using a low shutter ND is better anyway? Not really. Shuttr you should try to always leave at 1 / 50.
Antwort von TheTooOldBoy:
I do not think that can replace a software one steadycam. if at all, so you can make up very little stuttering really good. The attempt would be as if you'll try a good exposure by consuming Color balance correction. the result is one probably acceptable, but not comparable with the right technology.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hi,
have already used various Deshaker in AfterFX, Premiere and Avid synonymous. The software SteadiMove.
Such Programs already do really well, but even the best program / plug-in is never a Steadicam definitely replace. Suppose you're going slow with a car around a person, say with a distance of 10 meters. And the car springs as normal and down a bit high. Such movements you get away well.
Everything where it's really about walking movements is unrealistic. Otherwise, we would save us the money for a Steadicam're all ;-)
You should also note that the image quality is much worse, depending on how much you want to stabilize the video.
Many cameras are installed in such an image Stabilization. The Deshaker s.Computer You can set more accurate and better than s.einer Camera. But so you can test a bit to get a feel.
Best regards,
Constantin
Antwort von 0711video:
only know of proDAD "Mercalli, step movements with the bad man and zooms can compensate well. at Mercalli you have already pre-set parameters or can do individually. just look on the side of proDAD. Of course, this, but all magic other programs not synonymous and loss of quality is always given.
otherwise I would have an unopened, sealed version proDAD Mercalli 1.0. lying around here and sell. if you have interest, with Best short mail:
textkorrektur@aol.com
joachim
Antwort von blowup:
Have in recent days with a little Stabilizer features rumprobiert and the only tool that has convinced me was, Mercalli 2.0. However, suffered synonymous since the overall image quality is minimal. Provides synonymous for its own settings for rolling shutter.
Mercalli 2.0 is now integrated in many video applications. I have a few extra days bought Magix VDL 17 Premium. Is integrated with Mercalli Mercalli cheaper than a chance that there are ProDAD as a standalone or plug-ins. Still, the best solution is to film certainly the case that you do not need Deshaker.
Antwort von tommyb:
Each Deshaker analyzed only the motion vectors and reacts accordingly. The bottom line is this software just like an electronic image stabilization only potentially effective, because you have more time for analysis of motion vectors.
If you're unlucky, then recognizes the Deshaker a rapidly running through the picture as a person also unwanted camera movement and then the picture suddenly called to Page and then as s.Gummiband zurückzuschellen.
"Blowup" is absolutely right with his statement that one more effort should be put in place to shoot everything on the Deshaker card.
@ SsSonyY
In this special case where it goes in the motion field, the "always 1 / 50" rule of exception expire.
Subsequently stabilized movements with motion blur will always look like this as if someone somewhere is a fat subwoofer in the area. It shakes all jelly-like.
