Frage von applegreen:
Hi,
there are costs to buy useful 35mm adapter so 100-150 ¬?
Or should we build the adapter vll better themselves?
because I have not purchased my camcorder, I wonder whether I should buy synonymous vll rather a dslr (canon 500d), but this has again cons synonymous. otherwise it would halt the HG21. Has anyone perhaps a bloody rat for a beginner?
thank you very much
apple green
Antwort von Meggs:
Has anyone perhaps a bloody rat for a beginner?
With a 35mm adapter to achieve useful results is not so simple. The build yourself is certainly not synonymous for a bloody Beginners. The same goes for the shooting with a DSLR.
My tip: Purchase the HG21 and collect first time experience.
Antwort von masterseb:
1. you need a good camera. ¬ 4,000 upwards.
2. you need a good 35mm adapter ¬ 1000 upwards
below) is nothing
3. Then when videoDSLR canon 7D.
Bottom Line: a 35mm adapter is very expensive, absorbs light and must be properly gehandlet. a video DSLR but synonymous. But then factor fall off much light and complex building. depends, what do you do, because you need expertise in both. My council to borrow: Testing and!
Antwort von applegreen:
So my only problem is that I think (and many internet-) confirm the clips synonymous, in the short films, reports, etc. With the cheaper hd camcorders, the HG20 for example, were filmed, usually look so bad and so natural to me, the apprehension is natural that after 2 months, I no longer have with such a lust gets filmed.
Because I think gives a much better dslr ausblicke (simply because more opportunities).
So one could only expect s.einem price of ¬ 1200 or later (canon 7d) good video quality of a dslr?
(the other would, of course, the setup for a camcorder with 35mm adapters also least lie there, or not?)
Also answer: many thanks for the advice and quick!
mfg,
apple green
Antwort von masterseb:
7D, the canon with an optics will cost you around 2000euro. order but you can certainly make reportagen no, is it handheld on the ground rolling shutters not in it, synonymous only manual you complete access to camera parameter and focus. for film 1A, but not at all suitable. Moreover, the recording format for non-apple user to handle very steep. a good cam with 35mm adapter will cost you around 6000euro.
But as I said, the knowledge is priceless. with an XHA1 or HD110 are very beautiful things possible, it is not just the tiefenunschärfe, which gives the film look. look for the best film brings you the 7D and synonymous with the best of videoDSLRs (of the 5Dm2 apart). if you have little experience and have never worked so, dus you should think carefully and borrow as I said, and test.
Antwort von domain:
It seems to me that the market for 35mm adapter since the publication of the full-frame DSLR with video function is done.
This adapter has always been but a makeshift crutch, if synonymous in between leading to a very respectable results.
It begins at times so that conventional zoom lenses are not well suited for macro photography. What was being pushed for an expense, aspheric achromatic lenses for image enhancement and further rotating or vibrating focusing screens for dust control and reversing ads in the Monitor, quite apart from the double-focusing problem.
But everything is futile labor of love in the face of new opportunities.
If anyone today, targeted at all those detour solution, then he must probably have very specific reasons ...
Antwort von pilskopf:
When I think synonymous. Scene of shooting assumes both. So I understand why he was not quite synonymous Moritz has not bought the same Canon 7d or ne ne GH1 and now is looking for a 35mm adapter and is thereby thought to how he performs without a flip Hack Cam scrap. And all together cost more than ne 7D with 2 or even 3 lenses s.end. Perhaps he is synonymous explained to me sometime. My choice was clear, waiting for the GH1 or GH2, I would on a swiveling display never want to do without during the shoot, since it is synonymous happy time filming from a different position than from the standard addition is boring.
Antwort von Jake the rake:
So my only problem is that I think (and many internet-) confirm the clips synonymous, in the short films, reports, etc. With the cheaper hd camcorders, the HG20 for example, were filmed, usually look so bad and so natural to me, the apprehension is natural that after 2 months, I no longer have with such a lust gets filmed. The question is whether the s.der Technology s.sich is s.Usern or simply s.der mass?
A good film is synonymous with bad technique filmed a good movie.
Sensor size and optics used are rather trivial ...
Of course, a certain look can be achieved only with certain equipment, but when you Beginners thoughts about it later should you do otherwise you desire will pass even faster ...
So I agree with Meggs ...
Antwort von pilskopf:
One can, of course, familiarize DOF synonymous something expensive digital. (I must do this as a normal camcorder owners do not always want to give up DOF). I would rather buy a nice software to learn with this on a video in the postpro improve decently. I now love Sony Vegas pro 9 for his mask function. If you have a little practice, one can, thanks to the video screens in each build and enhance the picture blurs fact do not have much but I think the possibility should not be underestimated. When DOF is used? If one makes gscheit, in quiet and a few moments, which can be "slightly fake", unless you've worked a bit. Most people overdo it with DOF before unbelievable. Have seen times where a macro video of an ant 5d was filmed, was either the front or the rear leg blurred, so it was no longer laughable.
Antwort von domain:
The eye itself with its short focal indeed dominated almost no DOF, but the brain during normal vision focused on certain details, that is actually a digital zoom focal length without change.
But eventually it was noticed that the poor may, in reality, a telephoto lens imaging film selectively lift out what the director felt to be important.
Is basically a crutch just like any other process for the uplift and Hervorstreichung as vignettes in the film and much more.
But photographers have always been in this relationship very fascinated of variable focal lengths, which were so superior to the eye just like a jet plane to the bird.
Only what is shown, both by Lowlightsektor as synonymous to the DOF sector of amateurs, is often beyond the pale, because the image statement is not exaggerated, and underlining, but only mesh and fashion.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Absolutely correct. The most important thing is still the motive and the meaning behind what you really want to show films and. The subject's will to film, not the coolness of DOF motion. It is really something beautiful with each cam films (iPhone excluded: D). Dof is totally overrated and conceals more than it shows.
