Infoseite // 70-200mm Lens 2.8er of Canon, Sigma or Tamron?

Frage von Moritzk:


Hello Slashcam User

I search for a telephoto zoom lens for Canon EOS 550D.
On the search I am on the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-hit 5.6, which in many reviews so cutting very well. With a price of about 1200 ¬, it does not cost just a little, but I've chosen for this Lens.
... Except there is still a cheaper alternative with the same or better quality.

Best regards and thanks,
Moritz



Antwort von B.DeKid:

For filming or photography?

You can not use it s.einer Mattebox!

MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von Filmo:

the shooting likely that the new 70-300 L IS USM would be more appropriate (; rotary zoom), but still need ne tripod mount to the Canon has once again saved, just as they do so gladly, sometimes with sun visor and then again ... . see above!

The price however is ......!!!



Antwort von rush:

"Moritzk" wrote: Hello Slashcam User

I search for a telephoto zoom lens for Canon EOS 550D.
On the search I am on the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-hit 5.6, which in many reviews so cutting very well. With a price of about 1200 ¬, it does not cost just a little, but I've chosen for this Lens.
... Except there is still a cheaper alternative with the same or better quality.

Best regards and thanks,
Moritz


f 4.5 - 5.6? I would say difficult ... At least not if you want to work so synonymous film.

And 400mm s.Crop are damn much ... that you will not hold tripod impossible.

I would probably look more like a place s.deiner lichstarken 70-200 ... so 'nen 2.8er and one probably. yet with stability.

Another advantage with things: the length does not change the zoom ... So is synonymous with a matte box, etc. are used as required.

I know my price, Canon is not, but guess that could get there, possibly used or, alternatively, Sigma / Tamron ...



Antwort von B.DeKid:

"Rush" wrote: ....

I would probably look more like a place s.deiner lichstarken 70-200 ... so 'nen 2.8er and one probably. yet with stability.
...

So he does not get the Canon for the price ... the Tamron he gets for the price. This should be pretty good.

MfG
B. DeKid

http://www.amazon.de/Tamron-70-200mm-Macro-digitales-Lens/dp/B0013DG08E



Antwort von rush:

"B. DeKid" wrote: "Rush" wrote: ....

I would probably look more like a place s.deiner lichstarken 70-200 ... so 'nen 2.8er and one probably. yet with stability.
...

So he does not get the Canon for the price ... the Tamron he gets for the price. This should be pretty good.

MfG
B. DeKid

http://www.amazon.de/Tamron-70-200mm-Macro-digitales-Lens/dp/B0013DG08E

Yes, the lens is perfectly fine ... she's had for Nikon mount.
The AF is just not mega fast and unfortunately synonymous little louder. Furthermore, one can not intervene in the manual AF, as it is at USM / AF-S / HSM lenses of the case. So, no AF override possible.

Otherwise, the price for a good part .... Series variance is always an issue in the third-party - but should not be overstated I think. Have been synonymous with issues of belonging to the original lenses.



Antwort von B.DeKid:

"Rush" wrote: .... Furthermore, one can not intervene in the manual AF, as it is at USM / AF-S / HSM lenses of the case. So, no AF override possible .....

You need to have MoritzK explain what this means, the young knows with; from (D) SLR not so good.

@ Moritz

be switched; Here must s.Lens to MF (ManuellesFocusieren) (: what you should do anyway always) - because you would then against the (; AF) engine which rotate the lens is not healthy for.

Some high-contrast, synonymous Objektiveen you can turn move in the AF position the focus ring.

The AF mode is not as fast in the photo is actually not so tragic s.der 550D, s.einer 7D or Canon 1er however, could be annoyed with the use of sports photography.

The Tamron is definitely better than the old Canon 70-200 series (f 4) Otherwise, I'm still as the EF 100-300 USM the synonymous but not as strong light, and can not synonymous with MatteBox be used. Also, the focus ring is not really pleasant to shoot.



MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von Filmo:

now would be really first clarify the purpose for which the good man for the part needs to be here before next recommended into the blue ......



Antwort von rush:

"Filmography" wrote: now would be really first clarify the purpose for which the good man for the part needs to be here before next recommended into the blue ......

So I can lichstarkes 70-200 in all cases recommend - no preference whether for sports, portraits or even synonymous to the zoo ... : D

When the longer focal is urgently needed, however, you have to take what actually longer.






Antwort von Moritzk:

"B. DeKid" wrote: For filming or photography?

You can not use it s.einer Mattebox!

MfG
B. DeKid

I apologize now for the first Answer, had some stress and then completely forgot this thread :-)

So I feel first and foremost to the proximity or the distance of the object and ran to get as close as possible ... but I would like for both the shooting and photography use.
But Mainly probably more so for photography of people at events, demos, weddings
So the intimate frame is not disturbed, but I'm still close.
What you can do it for there?

300mm should be there already ... yes 200mm is now not as close to



Antwort von B.DeKid:

200 mm x1.6 mm Picture scale = 320 (; KB)


.................

The 100 - 400 mm is already ne good lens you may distribute the skip ahead now.

I would say only that they stop when zooming forward rausfaehrt the tube.

MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von Moritzk:

I think I just got a half Orga ... get as I've seen the quality of the images, which with a Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 Lens has been made.
HAMMER !!!... horny sharpness, beautiful blur ... just horny
've Seen some pictures here:

http://www.dslr-forum.de/showthread.php?t=246501&page=139

And for about 990 ¬ synonymous still quite affordable.

Best regards,
Moritz



Antwort von B.DeKid:

http://de.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/canon/

This time Canon 100-400 http://de.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=589

As can actually find so general to each lens sample images.

The 70 - 200 is installed but no stability (, so what are you for 990, - mean)

If you want to buy one rather then the 70-200mm L IS USM II ;-)) which costs a few dollars more but can NEN synonymous a lot more ;-))

Here some pictures of the Tamron 70-200 which I had noted above times (; EUR 615.96)

http://de.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=12844

Here, the EF 100-300mm USM years that I've been very good synonymous http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/ Canon EF 100-300mm f-4.5-5.6 USM Lens Review.aspx (; EUR 331.47)

http://de.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=722

MfG
B. DeKid

Consider the depth of field is synonymous with doing the Focal and not only with the Aperture ;-))



Antwort von Moritzk:

Hy Byörn

Would you so reluctant to speak again, but I find visually clear differences between the lenses.
Certainly, the synonymous s.der post, which surely push some amateur photographers before you upload it in forums.
... But if not, then I think we see a clear qualitative difference!
The pictures from the Tamron seem very cold, angular, somehow not as round as that of the Canon 2.8.
Can deceive me synonymous.
Do so if you're in love then you never see the reality :-)
And what should I buy Canon 2.8er of me, and what can it more ... and I need this more then synonymous functions?

Best regards,
Moritz



Antwort von B.DeKid:

Haste has correctly recognized the Tamron is soft to see times

http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron_70-200_2p8_c16/page2.asp

Since they have taken the trouble to compare times and Canon Nikon Sigma and Tamron.

.......................

The 70 - 200 of Canon there is just synonymous with stability (IS) so what makes some sense if the charge is being justified in your application that you have to decide and especially your wallet ;-)

Since then the 70-200 F4 Canon 70-200 F2.8 with the up-ge - has dated play in the league again is synonymous with the highest level-the Canon in any case, top and if you could use it with extender then would have You synonymous with the 400mm F4.8 that this is not synonymous bad ;-)

So how do you do with words of the Canon lenses you have mentioned nothing wrong. Everything else is purely a question of money! In addition to Canon in my eyes, only Nikon is relevant!

I would like to film a Nikkor 200mm F2 AIs ;-))

MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von Filmo:

or this:


http://www.amazon.de/ Canon -200mm-USM-Teleobjektiv-bildstabilisiert/dp/B00139YBFC

:-)))

I've used for years:

Canon EF L IS USM 28/300mm, a real universal thing with its focal length range, but synonymous quite a chunk in his hand ....


http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/canon_28-300_l_is_review.htm



Antwort von Moritzk:

Thanks but unfortunately a bit too expensive!



Antwort von B.DeKid:

;-)) I think he was referring more to the filmography of AIs raised me with his Canon 200 ;-))

....................

OT

@ Filmography

Yes I know is synonymous but then NEN bissel too expensive or more expensive than NEN AIs ;-)) But I think you could beat with the AIs in some situations to have fun Qualitatively, the peaks so ne Optics.

Have you used the Canon in the studio or for the press work?

/ OT


MfG
B. DeKid






Antwort von rush:

"B. DeKid" wrote: Haste has correctly recognized the Tamron is soft to see times

http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron_70-200_2p8_c16/page2.asp

Since they have taken the trouble to compare times and Canon Nikon Sigma and Tamron.



Did you read that correctly synonymous?

The Tamron 70-200mm Macro performs well on the APS-C format "... ...." Resolution is so impressive, matching or Exceeding the much more expensive Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM s.all settings except wide open s.135mm "

So for me, is - at least according to this test of you linked (; Page 4 - Test results) - the Tamron in the optical advantage ...
Drawback is slower and stop the loud AF ... Just think there could be stoking Tamron at times .. Who now so synonymous finally s.Start an ultrasonic motor;)

I have it so for Nikon and it is actually quite good optical ... synonymous when it now has to go:)

In dslr forum-many make their edited photos in the galleries .. there must always be a little careful man! :) There will be sharpened in part without batting an eyelash or anything gephotoshopt: D



Antwort von B.DeKid:

@ Rush
I had that all I had read (; although a while ago) but so had the Tamron so I threw in the pot as an alternative.

Especially in relation to the targeted price of TO I still think it is a good alternative.

..........

That's all I wanted to say not at all ultimately the decision is yes in Him.

I wanted only to halt the Tamron attention - synonymous when I hold only (almost only use Canon Lenses)


MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von Filmo:

"B. DeKid" wrote: ;-)) I think he was referring more to the filmography of AIs raised me with his Canon 200 ;-))

....................

OT

@ Filmography

Yes I know is synonymous but then NEN bissel too expensive or more expensive than NEN AIs ;-)) But I think you could beat with the AIs in some situations to have fun Qualitatively, the peaks so ne Optics.

Have you used the Canon in the studio or for the press work?

/ OT


MfG
B. DeKid



OT:
By using (; for nature photography) I have the 28-300 L IS USM meant;

And yes, bezgl 1.8 / 200mm, I referred to your 2/200AIS-Eintrag.Yes Nikon, the Nikon is ne super-Optics, a real gem from the manual Nikon AIS-time.



Antwort von B.DeKid:

OT

Thanks you for the feedback

But There Were 200 f1.8 I think of Canon FD only once as far as I know is the past year, but even older than I am ;-))

And I'd have 200 AIs I've irritating but synonymous grad yesterday a Leica R 28mm f2.8 Shift found - of course synonymous delicious - oh, I would still play and win lottery times ;-))

MfG
B. DeKid

/ OT



Antwort von Filmo:

@ B. DeKid:

OT:

The EF 1,8 / 200 L IS USM was the predecessor of the EF 2,0 / 200L, that is already u.Autofokus EF mount, but no image Stabilization.Aber gabs synonymous earlier than FD, as you correctly said.
With a little (; much) luck on Ebay .....

But what is the name in the lottery?

Everything is possible .....:-))

But nothing is fixed :-(;(;



Antwort von B.DeKid:

AIC THX 4 info again learned something ;-))



Antwort von Moritzk:

I think I would rather buy this lens :-)





Antwort von Filmo:

"B. DeKid" wrote: OT

Thanks you for the feedback

But There Were 200 f1.8 I think of Canon FD only once as far as I know is the past year, but even older than I am ;-))

And I'd have 200 AIs I've irritating but synonymous grad yesterday a Leica R 28mm f2.8 Shift found - of course synonymous delicious - oh, I would still play and win lottery times ;-))

MfG
B. DeKid

/ OT

You could now strike:


http://cgi.ebay.de/2-200-200mm-F2-F2-0-2-200mm-NIKON-AIS-D300-D700-F3T-FM2-/310173302715?pt=DE_Elektronik_Computer_Foto_Camcorder_Objektive_PM&hash=item4837c4ffbb



Antwort von B.DeKid:

FILMO Thanks but the boy I'm so ne Art ordinary client / stalker and just because he has so s.Start always sweetie ;-)






Antwort von Moritzk:

Moin Moin

Must now refresh the topic again, because I've still not decided: - /
Choice for now is the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM for 999 ¬, and the Sigma APO 70-200mm 2.8 EX for 649 ¬.

I am thrilled by the Canon and ansich love already :-) I really just do not know whether the name is alone on the Canon, what drags me to buy? The Sigma is cheaper than 350 ¬ and the money I could invest in a good fisheye.

From Canon I have seen many pictures and reports or read from the Sigma has less. What is the difference between the two lenses? Should I still invest ¬ 999 for Canon Lens, because the quality is really much better, or is it synonymous with the Sigma quite well? Or do you think is coming to a very different lens rather question?
What I think is not bad s.Sigma it is black :-)

'm Curious your opinions!

Moritz



Antwort von Filmo:

Black?
Can not be a problem:


http://www.willhaben.at/iad/kaufen-and-verkaufen/foto-tv-video-audio/canon-70-200-2-8-l-schwarz-23643140?adId=23643140


:-))



Antwort von Moritzk:

:-)

Ne times now seriously ... what do you think of the lenses?



Antwort von Filmo:

So I would always take the original optics, which have 2,8 / 70-200mm L USM "good reputation", synonymous in the case of resale in order to achieve better Comparison Prices.



Antwort von rush:

"Filmography" wrote: Black?
Can not be a problem:


http://www.willhaben.at/iad/kaufen-and-verkaufen/foto-tv-video-audio/canon-70-200-2-8-l-schwarz-23643140?adId=23643140


:-))

Ohh how elegant;) Because he would have the same or similar synonymous with Nikon can change: D


@ Motitzk: I would do well depending on your budget ... Or to try and handle both. You will certainly hear such and such opinions ... from Sigma is now synonymous with a variant of OS.



Antwort von Moritzk:

My budget are 1000 ¬, so the Canon would indeed fit well ... but if it is synonymous for 350 ¬ less a just as good Lens, I am synonymous like it :-)
But Sigma is not just Canon ... or do I mean it?
At Canon, I pay quite a bit but only for the name.



Antwort von rush:

Oh I see it not as tight, have good experience with Third-party lenses made for Nikon - including synonymous Sigma (30 1.4).

But if you now so desperately think about it - you just get the Canon ... otherwise you do you immediately think about tomorrow if it really was the right decision.
The whole matter of the head and in my eyes have you ever held (for Canon) ... ;)

If you do not want to test both separately - you can probably synonymous None here so really help next:)



Antwort von Filmo:

[Quote = "rush"] "Filmography" wrote: Black?
Can not be a problem:


http://www.willhaben.at/iad/kaufen-and-verkaufen/foto-tv-video-audio/canon-70-200-2-8-l-schwarz-23643140?adId=23643140


:-))

Ohh how elegant;) Because he would have the same or similar synonymous with Nikon can change: D




Yes elegant, no?
Under the motto: you must be stupid, but if you can help ....
Let's hope that the Color Brush with NEM was applied during spraying could be somewhat synonymous come inside .... well, that saves the other hand, the purchase of an ND filter :-))



Antwort von Filmo:

"Moritzk" wrote: My budget are 1000 ¬, so the Canon would indeed fit well ... but if it is synonymous for 350 ¬ less a just as good Lens, I am synonymous like it :-)
But Sigma is not just Canon ... or do I mean it?
At Canon, I pay quite a bit but only for the name.

This is not called Sigma APO version, at Sigma usually wear the more expensive and of better glasses of Optics her this name.
Similar to Nikon's ED Lenses or even Canon's L-Series






Antwort von B.DeKid:

Go test Lenses just in the store. That will probably be the best.



Antwort von Moritzk:

I live in Wismar ... here there is an expert and there are Lenses that exceed 400 ¬ cost :-)... if there is a more expensive, then hid for good customer ^ ^