I consider myself a few weeks ago after a long bought a 7D and I would now like to order other than the Canon 50mm 1.4 a wide-angle lens to purchase. I use the cam to take pictures and film alike, but it is important to me in the cinematic aspect of lens.
On the internet I've researched for days, read reports, etc., would in this discussion I draw s.sich besides the features you have in view the price, since there are 2 kinds of Lenses at a photo shop in my area now used but in good condition is, of course, at a cheaper price.
For Choice will then
Used Sigma 10-20mm 4.0-5.6, 380 ¬
Tokina 12-24mm used 4.0 ¬ 440
Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 min ¬ 600
Canon 10-22mm 3.5-4.5 min ¬ 650
If all would cost the same, I would probably opt directly for the Tokina 11-16, simply because of the continuous 2.8er Aperture to synonymous in the dark noise to achieve results. If anyone has any experience with said lenses or tips to help me, that is, for example, a small aperture in Weitwinkeln not so important or that one of the used article having a bomb price or what always synonymous, it would help me much (I am just always still fairly new as far as Stillimage Equipment).
Semi OT: The Tokina 12-24mm I had rented over the weekend and realized that parts of a video, which I have posted here in the forum synonymous few days ago already, the one who should be interested:
As of 1:12 min are 2 scenes that were added to vllt, can anyone say with a trained eye if the lens has certain weaknesses, which I have not seen as a layman vllt now, it's needed anyway.
Wrote a long, and short of it, I am grateful for every idea.
MfG Jendrik Hill
Antwort von B.DeKid:
The best of you is clearly listed the Lens Tokina 11-16 mm f2.8
MfG B. DeKid
Antwort von soan:
1st Tokina 11-16 is the top 2nd you're looking for an ultra wide angle, no wide angle. Just for info :-)
The Tokina 12-24 I had synonymous times, however, the difference of Aperture Aperture 2.8 to 4 very large. My Tokina 12-24 has had a very good image quality, but it just was not fast enough. For this reason, I would resign synonymous for the Canon 10-22.
With the Sigma I have made to date only bad experience so synonymous Optin this not for myself but rejected.
I am very satisfied so far with the 11-16 and can recommend it very much.
Antwort von r.p.television:
Also clearly the Tokina. Alone because of the continuous Aperture Here you have next to the better light sensitivity, despite still Gestaltungsmöglichkkeiten Super wide angle like a fuzzy floor in the foreground (when the camera is on the floor).
Generally I would advise you, but rather a 70-200 f2.8 (eg, Sigma), because here you can work out the true benefits of VDSLR. I have a 5Dmk2 and avoid it with actually making this camera easy wide-angle, because the terrain is just not her. The Alias | Wavefront Mayaing and the not-too-sharp picture flatters here is not so. That should leave you full HD camcorder.
I've watched your video. Nice angle. But buy yourself a monopod. This can be quickly and easily work without blurring Sun The differences of ink and Tripod are already very large.
I would buy my lens in this order:
A 70-200 f2.8 (Sigma II) a 24-70 f2.8 you already have the 50mm 1.4, and only then the Tokina 11-16mm f2.8
and above all a monopod like the Manfrotto 161B ;-)
Antwort von meawk:
correct - tokina 11-16 f2.8, the reference!
Samyang is a very cool synonymous 8mm f3.5 expected (especially for aps-c, therefore genuine 8mm s.aps-c-sensor. polen have the kind of time for 250 euro, was ever less expensive, but because of the large and global demand in risen in price between). have this objective, the amateur filmmaker on the platform introduced quasi vimeo and it enjoys great popularity for a time, synonymous with professionals. is a top-lens (fisheye). . . As synonymous 85mm f1.4 example of the Samyang - to film a bank