Frage von groth:
I forgot my system q6700 (@ 3.3 GHz, kalyway 10.5.4, 8gb ram, raid without samsung f1, ati 3870) on Mac OS X to run and wonder if it vista64 not render faster and could work. Now before I get to go: does anybody have any clues / tests / links?
my Slashcam-benchmark is exactly 300th equivalent systems listed under win xp seem to be faster. I know not what is showing in the game.
Antwort von pailes:
I forgot my system q6700 (@ 3.3 GHz, kalyway 10.5.4, 8gb ram, raid without samsung f1, ati 3870) on Mac OS X to run and wonder if it vista64 not render faster and could work. Now before I get to go: does anybody have any clues / tests / links?
my Slashcam-benchmark is exactly 300th equivalent systems listed under win xp seem to be faster. I know not what is showing in the game. Why should it render faster, the CPU performs the same or similar code. You do not think about that during the rendering time is spent in the operating system, right?
Antwort von Jake the rake:
The operating system can naturally be related! A certain part of the system always takes a part of your hardware resources!
The Windows machines can be faster is to ensure that the user often with the system optimization issues.
Maybe a yes in your friend circle a Vista DVD for you to see it at least inactive times (think because, in comparison to XP, nothing changed) debug.
Why should it render faster, the CPU performs the same or similar code. You do not think about that during the rendering time is spent in the operating system, right? There will always be the whole
time spent in the operating system
Or how do you imagine that before?
Antwort von pailes:
The operating system can naturally be related! A certain part of the system always takes a part of your hardware resources!
The Windows machines can be faster is to ensure that the user often with the system optimization issues. Well, that's a nice idea, but as someone who is professional software developers in the industry, I can tell you that you're as little as a user can turn off, because you can still so much registry tweaking;) because what you rausholen can make a marginal difference from as long as it is the same hardware and the differences lie only in the operating system.
Maybe a yes in your friend circle a Vista DVD for you to see it at least inactive times (think because, in comparison to XP, nothing changed) debug. I have with OS X, Linux and Windows (XP / Vista) to be done professionally and if no special hardware with the game is to give the operating system in such aspects of performance is not all a lot. Where there is any difference in load balancing on multiple CPUs / cores or the threading / process performance where OS X with its hybrid Mach / BSD kernel marginally worse. The user notes but not much, only the MySQL benchmarks, or similar tests as it closely.
There will always be the whole time spent in the operating system
Or how do you imagine that before? Because you're tremendous wrong. There is a difference between kernel-space (= OS) and user space (application). The rendering of video material is always in user space and thus completed the operating system has little influence on how quickly the code in the end there is executed. Ok, the scheduler is someday the user-space code and interrupt other tasks time to respond, but it can be so subtle abstracted times in the fall.
Antwort von groth:
Thank you for the answers. Would you recommend me, Windows, zb xp / vista 64, or Mac OSX on the calculator to install? I need the PC the next half year for my degree, almost exclusively for After Effects and CS3. I had my Hackintosh with the particular thought so, because I still synonymous Macbook Pro synonymous and have my external hard disks in the Mac-formatted system are synonymous but have nothing against Windows.
Antwort von pailes:
I know OS X only on Apple computers, but if you have the feeling it is stable and anyway you have a MacBook Pro, then I would take everything on OS X Align.
As mentioned above you will between the different operating systems only marginal differences in the performance of After FX found. In this respect, two different systems is probably more trouble than a homogeneous environment.
Antwort von Mylenium:
As mentioned above you will between the different operating systems only marginal differences in the performance of After FX found. In this respect, two different systems is probably more trouble than a homogeneous environment. Well, if you do not need 4GB in AE (works only on Win x64) ...
Mylenium
Antwort von groth:
the "hackintosh" reached under macos x 10.5.4 a benchmark of 300, under Vista 64 ultimate value to the 199th very strange.
Antwort von pailes:
the "hackintosh" reached under macos x 10.5.4 a benchmark of 300, under Vista 64 ultimate value to the 199th very strange. In fact. Is higher better or worse?
Antwort von Jake the rake:
Oje, Pailer belief was shaken. : D
If the value is to seconds ...
