Frage von Tomy:
Here comes the question:
Same field of view. Once NVGS with a 500 and once with a high definition cam (HDR HC1). Picture s.ende Which is the better if it happens on a PAL monitor is being played? A similar issue was already debated once, but my concern is specifically with the two camcorders, because they are about the same price (+ - 300 ¬).
Antwort von Tomy:
Because nobody has an answer?
Antwort von Markus:
You're very impatient! First of all, must find someone who owns both of these camcorders. And let's face it: Who makes twice in a row directly into the trap of a cheap camcorder to buy? ;-)
Antwort von Muecke2:
Same field of view. Once NVGS with a 500 and once with a high definition cam (HDR HC1). Picture s.ende Which is the better if it happens on a PAL monitor is being played? From the 3CCD chips NVGS of 500 is clearly produces a better picture. One can take values in specialized magazines Comparison times to watch.
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
How can you question an unclear on a clear answer?
The HDR HC1 HDV delivers certainly a better picture than the Panasonic.
IM DV mode will not do much.
KDS
Antwort von Markus:
The HDR HC1 HDV delivers certainly a better picture than the Panasonic. To this end a cross-reference to the following discussion:
Antwort von Muecke2:
Here you can synonymous times "fish" are:
http://www.videozona.ru/photo_tests/Ind/index.asp
Use Google to translate English Language ...
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
Well!
The HC1, I own, as well as the JVC GY DV5000 and even the old SonyPC100. The Panasonic, I know. I think I can even compare.
The question is synonymous, what with "PAL Monitor" means? Tube TV, prof. CRT monitor, LCD, plasma, with playback in DV or HDV?
Greeting
KDS
Antwort von Muecke2:
He felt sure a small portable television ...
zum Bild
