Frage von Kuddelmuddel:
Perhaps you can help me I can (to me, after many experiments, no more)
What are the best settings to play off each of the above mentioned programs in order to suffer less possible loss of quality.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Gruss
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi,
Now there are more than experiments on you.
If it's highest? Quality should be with me.
Export from NLE in single sequence to AE, then printing the result of the animation available to the encoder. And here are the final thoughts worlds. One has a great Mpeg2 Encoder, which likely fed with Mpeg files Encore, Encore is the other avis to himself.
Whoever wants to test now ....
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von kuddelmuddel:
erstmal danke:)
Further experiments .... oh no ... I thought I could get behind me stage time. but will test your response times.
thanks again
Antwort von Diego:
the more you try to come around not sure if you s
half is serious.
For me it was synonymous of Canopus Procoder for years the first choice.
As the development seems there are still, however, since the developers have made independent, the competition is at an advantage.
The main concept of the proposed H.264 Procoder in the processing time at length, the quality is at least equal.
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von grovel:
The main concept of the proposed H.264 Procoder in the processing time at length, the quality is at least equal. This is now a little bit but not compared apples with pears.
If you change the MainConcept MPEG2 codec meant, so unfortunately he's really not as good as Procoder.
SeeYa grovel
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi,
why apples with pears?
The H.264 offers the opportunity to MPEG 2 to wandeln.Das he makes more than twice as fast as the proc and the verdict on the quality would
I keep erhalten.Hast You have compared the two together?
Gruß Jörg
