Logo Logo
/// 
Kurztest: Sony XDCAM EX PMW-EX1R

Short review: SonyXDCAM EX PMW-EX1R



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:
August 2010

Short Review: Short review: SonyXDCAM EX PMW-EX1R of slashCAM - April 28, 2010 20:48:00
> In October 2009 has made Sonyseiner successful EX1 a "refurbished" sister model s.die Page with the name EX1R. With the innovations has often resorted to the ideas and experience of EX1 users. The result-with an EX1 usverbessertem switch layout is DVCAM recording, HDMI - Out and One-Push Slow and Quick Motion-Mo activation.
full article



Antwort von caren:

Those who have already made negative experiences synonymous with the autofocus of the EX1R?
This responds to my EX1R pretty nervous! In the middle of a scene moves the autofocus "unintentionally" the sharpness of the object in the foreground to the back.
Turns her the autofocus principle from?,
Or do not have the Prblem?
Clearly the dance of the autofocus is synonymous, if you look at the display of the depth of field.
Here you see me at least, that it changes constantly.
Not the depth of field but is away from the entire depth of field!
That is, the focus range is dancing across the distance indicator. In this wide Angleist less worse. because the focus range is large,
but the telephoto is it then to blurring inevitably, where they will not have.
What are your experiences?



Antwort von ruessel:

I use the camera in manual mode only, only very rarely in the operating stress is the auto-iris. The control units correspond to a camcorder from the 90s ;-)








Antwort von nordheide:

Is that you in general or only with little light?



Antwort von Jott:

Because of the 1 / 2 "sensors, the automatic, of course more problems than one third" and below it. Auto Focus is the most some anyway for emergencies (stress), as Russell writes, but not for normal work. Just push car makes sense.



Antwort von caren:

"Trunk" wrote:
I use the camera in manual mode only, only very rarely in the operating stress is the auto-iris. The control units correspond to a camcorder from the 90s ;-)




Antwort von caren:

"Nord heide" wrote:
Is that you in general or only with little light?




Antwort von caren:

"Jott" wrote:
Because of the 1 / 2 "sensors, the automatic, of course more problems than one third" and below it. Auto Focus is the most some anyway for emergencies (stress), as Russell writes, but not for normal work. Just push car makes sense.


So good for the film not for EX1R spontaneous. So one has to consider each Zenen precisely adjust the focus and then let it run. Only stupid, then that is the most important is over!
One has to think carefully about whether the EX1R the appropriate CAM. is.
Because in normal life event played only one time and you're in a box or not. If it is then imagines in blur, you can dispose of the scene and bagging!

So, the EX1R nothing is for fast! Because there are better.



Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Caren" wrote:
... So one has to adjust the sharpness ... and then off you go. Only stupid, then that is the most important is over ...

The EX1 is towards professional camera, which requires an equally synonymous handling, and of course, is a matter of practice. Snapshot in automatic mode, it is probably really not necessarily designed: the synonymous one can have much cheaper. But do you sometimes but with the already mentioned "Push AF" function familiar, because this is an incredibly practical history synonymous and just then, if it must happen quickly.



Antwort von zercher:

"Caren" wrote:
"Trunk" wrote:
I use the camera in manual mode only, only very rarely in the operating stress is the auto-iris. The control units correspond to a camcorder from the 90s ;-)


who can give some tips how to s.besten in manual mode is filming. on what needs to be paid for anything to go wrong and to achieve a good result. I am beginner in the area and would appreciate a few tips with which I must work in manual range. only the simplest and most important because with the majority, I do not know me from.

LG



Antwort von makra:

"Zercher" wrote:
only the simplest and most important because with the majority, I do not know me from.
LG


You have to practice. to use a Camera "of Hand" is like playing an instrument. With auto accompaniment you can practice without a large beautiful songs play on a keyboard. The result is only partially under your control. It is synonymous with the automatic functions of your camera. There is no "golden rule" which I could tell you easily. There are many little details to practice and as I said, practice and practice again.
Yourself to where you once where many people meet and pass s.dir. As you can very well exercise manual focusing. Open your Aperture to the whole, the ND filter and clean if necessary using a large focal (zoom ran quite). First you ask a close alternately static object and a distant static object sharp. For example, a tree and a trash or something. If that works fix and you get a feel how far and in what direction do you turn then have to try to put faces to the dynamically sharp as they come towards you. If you do your stuff and you start to bore you then synonymous of face to face "jump" and always nice to keep sharp dynamic.
This is fun and brings you very very much.



Antwort von Taunus:

"Caren" wrote:
"Jott" wrote:
Because of the 1 / 2 "sensors, the automatic, of course more problems than one third" and below it. Auto Focus is the most some anyway for emergencies (stress), as Russell writes, but not for normal work. Just push car makes sense.


So good for the film not for EX1R spontaneous. So one has to consider each Zenen precisely adjust the focus and then let it run. Only stupid, then that is the most important is over!
One has to think carefully about whether the EX1R the appropriate CAM. is.
Because in normal life event played only one time and you're in a box or not. If it is then imagines in blur, you can dispose of the scene and bagging!

So, the EX1R nothing is for fast! Because there are better.


You buy a EX1R, but has no experience??
You buy a Ferrari is so synonymous if you're doing the driving.








Antwort von Jott:

Of course one can work with manual focus at all times perfectly synonymous with stress. You can have it stop. Schulter-/Broadcastkameras and their operators are indeed synonymous at any time without autofocus, camera will not stop it overnight.

If you have a shoulder camera s.Schärfering the left hand, a finger may still s.Blendenring (Aperture, of course, synonymous manual!), And the right hand operates the zoom button. All the same, of course, runs on top of the shooting s.sich (art work) and if it is quite stupid, asking the synonymous nor the sound side of it. Unvollstellbar? Nope. Who's can get a lot of money for it.

The trouble with the EX1's just the design, dranbasteln you need something, if it is to lie on the shoulder. Cameras like the EX1 are somewhere "between worlds", priced as ergonomic, so you must arrange to halt.

The Panasonic 370, for example, makes the manual easier to work shoulder size and smaller sensors = more depth = more margin of safety at the edge. The often-ridiculed third "sensors are synonymous real advantages.



Antwort von caren:

"Taunus" wrote:
"Caren" wrote:
"Jott" wrote:
Because of the 1 / 2 "sensors, the automatic, of course more problems than one third" and below it. Auto Focus is the most some anyway for emergencies (stress), as Russell writes, but not for normal work. Just push car makes sense.


So good for the film not for EX1R spontaneous. So one has to consider each Zenen precisely adjust the focus and then let it run. Only stupid, then that is the most important is over!
One has to think carefully about whether the EX1R the appropriate CAM. is.
Because in normal life event played only one time and you're in a box or not. If it is then imagines in blur, you can dispose of the scene and bagging!

So, the EX1R nothing is for fast! Because there are better.


You buy a EX1R, but has no experience??
You buy a Ferrari is so synonymous if you're doing the driving.




Antwort von caren:

"Caren" wrote:
"Taunus" wrote:
"Caren" wrote:
"Jott" wrote:
Because of the 1 / 2 "sensors, the automatic, of course more problems than one third" and below it. Auto Focus is the most some anyway for emergencies (stress), as Russell writes, but not for normal work. Just push car makes sense.


So good for the film not for EX1R spontaneous. So one has to consider each Zenen precisely adjust the focus and then let it run. Only stupid, then that is the most important is over!
One has to think carefully about whether the EX1R the appropriate CAM. is.
Because in normal life event played only one time and you're in a box or not. If it is then imagines in blur, you can dispose of the scene and bagging!

So, the EX1R nothing is for fast! Because there are better.


You buy a EX1R, but has no experience??
You buy a Ferrari is so synonymous if you're doing the driving.


There is no lack of experience!
So, EX1R and back to the origin.
I do it again like to Super 8 times, as with the legendary Nizo 6080 and Canon EX1 (Hi8). At that time there were no auto-focus, or has one that works not really. I had already s.die usual nonchalance, especially as a SD707 synonymous only 1 / 4 "and has a lot more room in the depth there.
Well, because it means working again!
Yes and the "Push AF" function bstimmt is a good helper.



Antwort von ruessel:

There are only 1 / 2 inch chips, then you can not adjust well to the fixed focus, Aperture F5.6 and the entire picture is up in the middle focal sharp. In the tele anyway I would only set the manual focus.
A bit of the LCD and adjust with the right exposure it works well to run it is synonymous ..... or someone who actually used to the small and therefore inaccurate Histogram?



Antwort von nordheide:

I understand the responses of the real camera people here very well. That may be synonymous everything right and practically oriented. The EX1 (R), but - fortunately - no shoulder camera and so much more flexible to manage. If you want to or must.

My (zugegebenmassen short) experience with the EX1 at weddings is that the AF works great when speed is of you and the camera keeps s.Henkel and must adhere. In the church, in the movement, everything top.

Only by candlelight is not always the focus of the camera - but you have to live with and stop if necessary, of course, manual focus then.
Of course you can manual synonymous achieve a much better overall result.



Antwort von caren:

"Nord heide" wrote:
I understand the responses of the real camera people here very well. That may be synonymous everything right and practically oriented. The EX1 (R), but - fortunately - no shoulder camera and so much more flexible to manage. If you want to or must.

My (zugegebenmassen short) experience with the EX1 at weddings is that the AF works great when speed is of you and the camera keeps s.Henkel and must adhere. In the church, in the movement, everything top.

Only by candlelight is not always the focus of the camera - but you have to live with and stop if necessary, of course, manual focus then.
Of course you can manual synonymous achieve a much better overall result.


Unfortunately failed at a wedding when my EX1R autofocus!
Although the bomb was EX1R on the tripod!
At first everything was alright so sharp. Suddenly, the 'Yes word "the couple was blurred!, That is the focus went towards infinity, and only the background was displayed sharp. After 2 sec. the couple was again focused correctly, but the Yes word over.
Was the "YES" as wrong as the focus? As always synonymous, not alter it any more.
ONLY, next time only with manual focus!



Antwort von nordheide:

I can understand. The focus is rather slow, ie he needs to grasp at something, but then remains relatively long time, even if it swings slightly to the subject.

But it could be the focus speed, adjust if you wanted about.



Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Caren" wrote:
... EX1R denied the autofocus ... Suddenly bomb on the tripod ... the "Yes word" the couple was blurred ...

If both bride and groom stand still as synonymous Camera, then the auto focus is not only unnecessary, but - as is - synonymous fast times counterproductive. Happened has happened, but I's than just experience. You make this mistake at the next wedding is no longer determined.
Such a scene the way, is a prime example of the push-AF: EX1 on manual focus telephoto target the desired point of focus, push-press and final AF Zoom back again on the image. This is in practice faster than it reads here and you have the certainty that the sharpness is sitting.




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Short review: SonyXDCAM EX PMW-EX1R
New XDCAM EX of Sony: PMW-320
XDCAM codec (PMW-EX1)
Copy presets to SonyXDCAM EX - PMW-EX1
IBC - Sonylegt by - 16 GB in the XDCAM EX PMW-EX1 Package
SonyXDCAM PMW-EX1 - pre -
Drivers for Windows SonyXDCAM PMW EX1 clips to read out?
Sony PMW 400 mit Canon HJ40-fach Zoom Power Problem
Sony PMW-F3: ECS & Objektiv
Sony PMW-EX1 Firmware
Making a 35mm short film
Short Horror (Blackmagic Kameras)
"The Cure"-Short Film mit Mini Budget und Crew
Watch: Short Film That Shows the Low-Light Capabilities of the Blackmagic Pocket 6K Pro
short film DETOUR
kurzes Review 2019 der Naturfilmer
Review-Video: Zeapon Micro 2 & Zhiyun Weebill S: "Sliding Gimbal"
TechSmith Video Review und Snagit bis Ende Juni bei Bedarf kostenlos
Toms Mavic Air2 Review
Field review: Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Kinefinity MAVO Edge 8K Review
Canon RF 400mm f2.8 'L' IS USM - Review
Prototype Canon 400mm f/2 legacy lens review
Nach 5 Jahren GoPro jetzt die DJI Action 3 (Review)

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


AI
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avi
Avid
Avid Media Composer
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Editing
Effect
Error
Film
Final Cut
Format
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Movie
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Video
Videos