Infoseite // Test: Canon HF Legria S21



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


Test: Test: Canon HF Legria S21 of rudi - 4 Mar 2010 11:41:00
> Canon HF operates with the S-series model with only minor maintenance. A high-resolution display with touch screen and two SD slots make this the most striking innovations dar.
full article

Space


Antwort von videofreak2105:

So, I've now synonymous here once registered because my nerves a bit, and while some considerable detail in diveresen tests. It seems that often would just info copied from the previous model tests and inserted here.
The info with the overscan mode when the handler eg S21. is incorrect. The cam in the back is if any of these functions are enabled, S11 on the previous model S 100 HF HF HF S10 so, at the HF S21 remains in the Cam underscan, no preference what you do.
Did the extra tested again.
I also have my videos magazines purchased. The magazines are part of the text blocks that were just on the word of incorporated here, or vice versa. In the test videos in the same magazine info is on the overscan like this are not also true. In the Magazine is to support even a Stillimage inside this representation in the H S21, but this is one of the display of the RF Stillimage S100 series! Furthermore, I find it again and again, that many simply Articles of other tests are taken. And those details are in any case, the user criteria could discourage Purchase

Space


Antwort von Rolf Hankel:

"Videofreak2105" wrote: So, I've now synonymous here once registered because my nerves a bit, and while some considerable detail in diveresen tests. It seems that often would just info copied from the previous model tests and inserted here.
The info with the overscan mode when the handler eg S21. is incorrect. The cam in the back is if any of these functions are enabled, S11 on the previous model S 100 HF HF HF S10 so, at the HF S21 remains in the Cam underscan, no preference what you do.
Did the extra tested again.
I also have my videos magazines purchased. The magazines are part of the text blocks that were just on the word of incorporated here, or vice versa. In the test videos in the same magazine info is on the overscan like this are not also true. In the Magazine is to support even a Stillimage inside this representation in the H S21, but this is one of the display of the RF Stillimage S100 series! Furthermore, I find it again and again, that many simply Articles of other tests are taken. And those details are in any case, the user criteria could discourage Purchase


Yes and why I give the whole so-called tests nothing at all

Regards Rolf ...

Space


Antwort von Replay:

I give this test is only very little, they are only a very rough guide. me interested in a device, I organize myself to test it with a memory card to dive or at least in the electric market to come s.Originalaufnahmen.

Space


Antwort von videofreak2105:

Well, it may be, that tests are more evidence, since although many tests are similar, but often synonymous very different, the one praising a cam, some less good writing about the same model.
But if one reads through various reports, the test often contradicts in itself. In the report in the magazine was first, which LowLighteigenschaften are good, but again stood in the resume that they are less good.
And in the current issue is surely less a certain tolerance but simply misinformation concrete. And something we should in my view to make all right. After all, there are hundreds if not thousands of people make their decisions on the basis of such reports.
In my main forum digitalvideoschnitt.de I refer to such reports and other users. I will be careful in future in any case generally, I refer to the tests, at least I am now become himself in general very skeptical

Space


Antwort von Replay:

Contradictions in a test with one minute can inform Internet research. If you have read five tests (no preference in what language), can (sometimes synonymous recognize between the lines) may leave some basic tenor. Subtleties when I make an interesting device simply by yourself.

And for other questions there are forums. Also there is a certain selection is not wrong, but generally we realize the real weaknesses of a camera relatively quickly. So one can create quite a good quick overview of a device.

Space


Antwort von videofreak2105:

There you have, however, perfectly right, because I can not disagree :-)

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Canon G10 first RF test
Canon 550D with levitation system test
Test: Canon HF Legria S21
Canon 300 vs. Lowlighttest XF. SonyEx1
How to test a Canon XM1
Canon 7D Alias | Wavefront Mayaing Test - 720p50 virtually unusable!
New test clips on the Canon 7D
Canon MVX25i-Test/Erfahrungen
Test of the Canon FS11
Canon HF 20 tests




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash