Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV)
Frage von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen: April 2020
Hello,
who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the "true" 16:9 can? In the instructions, only the "black bars above and below will be displayed to select a widescreen feel to let. According to some vendors, however, the device can be 16:9, but I the two statements can see a big contradiction. Maybe but only the instructions poorly translated.
-- Answers to public questions, please ONLY public. My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt. Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Detlev Hoffmann:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote in news post Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV) # # # > Hello, > > Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the > "True" 16:9 can? In the instructions, only the "black Girder 1. Wrong group 2. No, you can not really 16:9
Detlev
Antwort von Dieter Lefeling:
Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
> Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the > "True" 16:9 can?
What is for you "real" 16:9? Per true 16:9 CCD with 960x576? How many cameras can be and what the cost? Or do you have a Recording anamorphic aspect ratio of 720x432 by => without Aufloesungsgewinn? What advantage would be the consequences?
> In the instructions, only the "black bars > Above and below will be displayed to select a widescreen feel to > Let. According to some vendors, however, the device can be 16:9,
The remainder of the picture has a Seitenverhaeltnis of 16:9, yes. <8) After all, the instructions in this case seems to be honest.
> Where I > The two statements can see a big contradiction. Maybe > But only the instructions poorly translated.
Remain realistic. Do you have a camcorder in the beginners class around 300 euros, "16:9" realized otherwise than by 720x432 letterbox?
Camera on, select 4:3, left and right Bildraender view. Switch to 16:9. Falls above or below what is gone or left / right what about this? AFAIK, the GS27 of the first case (Letter).
Dieter
Antwort von Günter_Hackel:
Dieter Lefeling wrote: > Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote: > >> Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the >> "Real" can be 16:9? > > What's for you "real" 16:9?
Hello which is expected out of context but clear. Correct 16:9 requires a chip, this format of the scan can be synonymous. What the Camera, IMO with the intention to deceive is concerned, is to cover a Part of the "4:3" format, ie a reduction of the image content rather its extension. gh
Antwort von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
"Detlev Hoffmann" wrote:
> 1 Wrong group
And what would be better suited?
-- Answers to public questions, please ONLY public. My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt. Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
Dieter Lefeling wrote:
> What's for you "real" 16:9?
That what makes the SonyPC 101 and in my calculator synonymous than 16:9 arrives (anamopxyz. .. - I can not remember this word).
Now made a test recording shows the following: For the same Preferences / requirements such as the Sony is a 16:9 Bildschirmfesnter packed. The Sony picture is correct and proportionnelles bild filling (if synonymous only 720 x 576). The Picture of the Panasonic is * on all 4 sides with * black bars limited. But here is synonymous "720 * 576" is displayed.
Mir is ultimately no preference, as 16:9 is realized when the Feeling fit, since the finished film on alternate settings both cameras will be based.
> Do you have a camcorder in the beginners class > To 300 euro, the "16:9" realized otherwise than by 720x432 letterbox?
The Sonyhabe I get for 450 that does that .. Why 432?
-- Answers to public questions, please ONLY public. My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt. Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Dieter Lefeling:
Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
> Dieter Lefeling wrote: > >> What's for you "real" 16:9? > > This is what makes the SonyPC 101 and in my calculator synonymous than 16:9 > Arrives (anamopxyz. .. - I can not remember this word).
To my knowledge, uses the PC101 neither a "true" 16:9 - CCD still an anamorphic optics. Accordingly, she works like other cameras synonymous: Recording with 720x432 with subsequent distortion of 720x576. In other words, this is better than aufloesungstechnisch not letterbox. Okay, a true 16:9 - CCD synonymous anything else would be very expensive. <8)
> Meanwhile made a test recording shows the following: For the same > Settings / specifications as the Sony is a 16:9 Bildschirmfesnter > Up. The Sony picture is correct and proportionnelles bild filling (if > Synonymous only 720 x 576).
Exactly.
> The Picture of the Panasonic is * on all 4 sides with * > Black bars limited. But here is synonymous "720 * 576" is displayed.
Letterbox precisely. Of the 576 lines are 432 for the actual Picture used, the rest is the black border above and below.
> I, it is ultimately no preference, as 16:9 is realized,
Well, there are already procedures depending on the qualitative differences:
> If the > Impression fits, since the finished film on alternate settings > Both cameras will be based.
You could apply a letterbox anamorphic video to convert and so with the anamorph Sony already recorded video combine.
>> Do you have a camcorder in the beginners class >> Around 300 euros, "16:9" realized otherwise than by 720x432 letterbox? > > The Sonyhabe I get for 450 that does that .. Why 432?
The 432 are just 9 / 16 of the 768th The fact that the camera 768, but 720 is used, has other reasons.
Dieter
Antwort von Detlev Hoffmann:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote in news post Re: Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV) # # # > "Detlev Hoffmann" wrote: > >> 1 Wrong group > > And what would be better suited? In any case, not the de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie in which this Tread as cross-posting (or how the heist?) Appeared synonymous. Then covered my answer. Gruss Detlev
Antwort von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
"Detlev Hoffmann" wrote:
> In any case, not the de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie
Why not? It is finally digital recording of images.
-- Answers to public questions, please ONLY public. My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt. Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Detlev Hoffmann:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote in news post Re: Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV) # # # > "Detlev Hoffmann" wrote: > >> In any case, not the de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie > > Why not? It is finally digital recording of images. > Sorry, as you will in the group probably de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie alone From selfishness, you have probably the sense 'photography' not quite understood ;-)
Grüßle Detlev
Antwort von Kristian Schmees:
Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
[Camera Panason ** NV ...] >> 1 Wrong group > > And what would be better suited?
Good question. I would take de.rec.tv.technik - although I synonymous not 100% find. Is s.Thema but closer than ever in a comp * *- Group.
Regards Kristian
Antwort von Ka Prucha:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote > > This is what makes the SonyPC 101 and in my calculator synonymous than 16:9 > Arrives (anamopxyz. .. - I can not remember this word). > > Meanwhile made a test recording shows the following: For the same > Settings / specifications as the Sony is a 16:9 Bildschirmfesnter > Up. The Sony picture is correct and proportionnelles bild filling (if > Synonymous only 720 x 576). The Picture of the Panasonic is * on all 4 sides with * > Black bars limited. But here is synonymous "720 * 576" is displayed.
Servus
The Canon MVX200i is useful 16x9, but then the "loose balance" is no longer in operation because the extra pixels yes for the additional width needed.
