Logo Logo
/// 
Weitwinkelvorsatz für SONY HDR-FX1

Wide Angle Lens for Sony HDR-FX1



Frage von Larez:
Juli 2007

Hello,

Seeking filmmakers who have experience with the various Weitwinkelvorsätzen made for the FX1.

1. the official converter:
http://www.dnet24.de/xt/product_info.php?ref=53&products_id=0000000616450

2. Noname one of ebay.de:
http://cgi.ebay.de/72mm-0-6x-WEITWINKEL-Makro-f-SONY-CANON-PANASONIC_W0QQitemZ5881570027QQcategoryZ18612QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

3. Noname one of ebay usa:
http://cgi.ebay.de/72MM-0-5X-WIDE-ANGLE-LENS-MACRO-FOR-SONY-VCL-HG0872_W0QQitemZ7599521408QQcategoryZ64327QQssPageNameZWD2VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

In particular I would be interested in the quality of each adapter, and whether any of the converter can achieve almost fish-eye effects!?

Thank you in advance & greetings,

Larez.



Antwort von Nico A.:

Hey! gibs do not respond? The Case I would be synonymous Interesi times!



Antwort von r.p. television:

Hello.

Also with the in-house Sony Converter s.der FX1, I've achieved very good results. No vignetting, no edge blurring and chromatic aberration are not synonymous with no more than converters.
A Fish-Eye is a long but not, but simply a good wide angle. The converter has only a factor 0.8. A Fisheye really 0,4-0,3.

If you are looking for a fisheye, I would take the Raynox FE-180 Pro. See Raynox Page. He's adapted very well and synonymous s.The FX1.
However, you can through the Fisheye Converter durchzoomen not fully synonymous, and he vignetted probably quite easily in the lowest focal.
The Raynox does, I think about 500 Euros.

I would but you still (or additional) MF recommend the Sony converter. Because you can not always need to deliver such a distorted picture a la fisheye but still low focal lengths.
In addition, the included Calyx-Sunshade is very practical and functional.

On the other converter I can only say so much:

Of me I can show them to my dealer, because he bought it to show his customers what a scrap it.
Immense edge blurring. When Durchzoomen the Picture is milky. Vignetting and increased CA.
You can shoot through a bottle bottom synonymous. Hands off!








Antwort von Nico A.:

Hey!

Thx for the quick infos! times will investigate some models of the two above!

are with the other converter eg the Raynox meant! I mean the costs synonymous times Euronen his 400?
is really so bad?

Need to stop filming the climb was too.
drann there is usually one nearby and it was everything in the picture!

Thx
Nico www.Boulderholics.de



Antwort von r.p. television:

No, the Raynox Fisheye is a very good and much cheaper than the synonymous of Fisheye Century, which can do nothing better - tend to be worse.
If YOU specifically looking for a fisheye that is the best choice.
In a normal wide-angle converter, I would recommend you to Sonyfür of 600 Euros. So I see no visible difference to the Century 0.8 can. And it costs so the 1000, --

With your hands off, I mean the Ebay offerings.



Antwort von Rainer Mueller:

Hi,

you can only recommend Century. Habe nen ne F1X with:

Century Wide Angle Lens
from the PRO-Series
VS-07CV-HDS 0.7X

Synonymous've tried everything and am s.der FX7 synonymous since landed at Century.

The entire area can be durchgezoomt WW.
Have synonymous to the other tested low-cost area. Everything in the WW area and Tonnenförige cushion distortion.

Who ne Top Cam s.WW intent should nich save.

www.pictureland.de

Since you will advise best.

Gruss
rainer Muller



Antwort von r.p. television:

Did not he know that there is a synonymous 0.7 Converter for the FX1.
The wide angle is preferable because of better performance then, of course.
But do not buy all Century products without reservation. Not all are as good as its reputation. The best way to test well and (at the edge blur is synonymous with Century already happened to me back). Since $ 1,000 is just too expensive.



Antwort von Nico A.:

I will then save a little time!
but super infos thank you!



Antwort von Gerd Transetter:

There is now the new Raynox HDP-6000. Diverses've already read about it, but no user info.

http://raynox.co.jp/german/video/hdp6000ex/index.htm

Gruss

Gerd




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Canon XH-A1 or SonyHDR-FX1 - which is better?
SonyHDR-FX1 purple stripe / BAR in the PICTURE? WHAT IS IT? HELP!
how do I via MAC & HDR-FX1 in real time?
SonyHdr-UX1 can not read the data
The FX1's successor: SonyHDR-FX7
SOny HDR-FX1, FX7 or Canon XH-A1?
Price Trend for the HDR-FX1
Sports enclosure for SonyHDR-UX1
sony HDR-FX1 problem ...
Short and scarce: HDR-FX1
PANASONIC dvx100b one or a Sony HDR FX1 buy?
Sony firmware upgrade for the HDR-UX1 and HDR-SR1 fixes sound problem
Sony HDR FX1
SONY FX1 Kassetten auslesen
Die Sache mit dem Shutter Angle
Raynox "0.66 HD Conversion Lens 58mm": Gut für die Sony AX53 (4K)?
FS5: Shutter bleibt nicht auf 180° Angle!
Bildstreifen horizontal und vertikal SONY AVCHD-Handycam (Sony HDR-XR550)
Canon XF200 - Wide DR oder was?
Davinci Resolve 17 Wide Gammut
DaVinci Wide Gamut vs ACES
Working with Wide Color Gamut in Final Cut Pro X
Sony Camcorder HDR SR 11
Canon C100mkII Picture Profile Test - Log, Wide DR, Standard
Sony HDR-AS30V Speicherkarte
Sony HDR HC1E,kein Monitorbild

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
AI
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Avid Media Composer
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
KI
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos