Infoseite // diy DOF adapter test ......... focuscreen?



Frage von der_demonstrant:


First test footage here, as it now looks to ......


denk with better screen would make it even better, had someone tips on this? and general diy DOF would be nice:)

Camera: GS330
lens: spiegelreflex objectively revuenon f = 55mm; 1: 1.7
focus screen: plastic dummy of his cd
Type: static adapter (on the upside in stativ included with device, makrolense shot from spielgelreflexobjektiv, with extension tubes on the distance of focus screen)

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"der_demonstrant" wrote: First test footage here, as it now looks to ......


denk with better screen would make it even better, had someone tips on this? and general diy DOF would be nice:)

Camera: GS330
lens: spiegelreflex objectively revuenon f = 55mm; 1: 1.7
focus screen: plastic dummy of his cd
Type: static adapter (on the upside in stativ included with device, makrolense shot from spielgelreflexobjektiv, with extension tubes on the distance of focus screen)


Who just times your material committed DIY adapters and with no experience, will say: awful! I will not.

The first steps are almost always so, and in terms of materials you used, it is no wonder. You've built with scrap Bastel (applies for synonymous's Lens). In this
It is typical that a picture looks as if you had the Postpro the contrast is greatly reduced. With another screen because you can make something. To respond to your no-budget level to stay: I had, after many experiments with wax between Diagläschen (blistering almost inevitable) and various glass and plastic materials, a reasonably good place: An e-PROs bag. Are they comfortable in this form is no longer, but I describe them times,
maybe you'll find something: frosted plastic film, similar to a particularly thick Mülltüte, with fairly uniform, fine grain. Must be glued in a frame. Since it is fairly thin, you can make sharp crisp synonymous. As well they also scatter light and little swallow, little vignette education.

Search motifs with high contrast, light sources in the Picture, back, sun. The bottle of shampoo in the bathroom is dull as not right for. Better was the final image, synonymous if honest, I do not know what it represents ....


Space


Antwort von der_demonstrant:

Hi,

thank you for your designs, you can tell me what lens you should use name? because if I have a 35mm spiegelreflex objectively and take draufzoome with the macrolens then yes it is no longer 35mm (picture), my mind went there with the 55mm to 35mm which of course would be admitted glück:).
I realized that my my camera (pana 3CCD GS330) hatt small chips and, therefore, not so good with the lichtverlusst kalrkommt with adapter ........ I still have my old an objective selection and father to be a:

1. revuenon 1: 2.8 / f = 35mm
2. zenit helios 1: 2 / f = 58mm m52x0, 75
3. maiya / Sekor Zoom 1:4.5 / f = 90mm ~ 230mm

at the moment is indeed the revuenon 1: 1.7 / f = 55mm adapter drauf aufm building.

It is not the number 1: 1.7 more light durchbringt?


I will say with its other screen (as you've described it in more light in free) try ......... I poste then again, can you me with the right objective, explain? danke erstmal, grüsse

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"der_demonstrant" wrote: thank you for your designs, you can tell me what lens you should use name? because if I have a 35mm spiegelreflex objectively and take draufzoome with the macrolens then yes it is no longer 35mm (picture), my mind went there with the 55mm to 35mm which of course would be admitted glück:)
No.. The best would be a 35mm lens. This is a Wide Anglefür KB and a standard lens for 16:9, try f2.0 or larger (smaller number) to get. Old Minolta Lenses are sometimes easy to get. Otherwise, the 55mm 1.7 is okay, the other three are not favorable of the values.

"der_demonstrant" wrote: I realized that my my camera (pana 3CCD GS330) hatt small chips and, therefore, not so good with the lichtverlusst kalrkommt ..... with adapters

The best DV camera for a ist das The smaller your lens, the weaker the Nahlinse be when you have a need. And faint the Cam is not to my knowledge. 3 CCD also provide for better color in low light.

"der_demonstrant" wrote: It is not the number 1: 1.7 more light durchbringt?

Yes.


"der_demonstrant" wrote: I will say with its other screen (as you've described it in more light in free) try ......... I poste then again, can you me with the right objective, explain? danke erstmal, grüsse

Try it yourself with the other three lenses. You will remember what matters. Maybe the 35mm 2.8 yet, but it is quite bleak.

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Test shots with 35mm adapter Letus promotional clip for Extreme
diy DOF adapter test ......... focuscreen?




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash