Frage von Martin Schneider:
Hello!
I need a 2x telephoto lens for a Sony VX-1000 DV video camera.
Now I came across the Canon TC-DC 52, the 2.4-fold and has a nominal
synonymous, the 52 mm filter thread owns. Has anyone tried this? (Before
I look at eBay as a thing and shoot behind it does not help).
Thanks and regards,
Martin
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Martin Schneider wrote:
> I need a 2x telephoto lens for a Sony VX-1000 DV video camera.
>
> Now I stumbled on the Canon TC-DC 52, the 2.4-fold and has a nominal
> synonymous the 52 mm filter thread owns. Has anyone tried this? (Before
> I look at eBay as a thing and shoot behind it does not help).
What is unclear?
Basically does a pairing ever, if the parts
mechanically fit (same filter thread or greater with accessories
Lens adapter to smaller).
The question is, if the optical quality of the combination.
As a strong telephoto converters can be synonymous, incidentally (high quality)
Binoculars and telescopes vain.
Antwort von Martin Schneider:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> What is it unclear?
> In principle, such a pairing works always, provided the parts
> Mechanically fit (same filter thread or greater with accessories
> Lens adapter to smaller).
> The question is, if the optical quality of the combination.
That is what. I have a Raynox-180 ° Fisheye, the s.einer
Camera very good, but other s.einer only moderate results.
Seems to be of the existing lens abzuhängen.
Hence my question of whether someone uses exactly this combi.
Greeting
Martin
Antwort von Josef Moellers:
Martin Schneider wrote:
> Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
>
>> What is it unclear?
>> Basically does such a pairing ever, if the parts
>> Mechanically fit (same filter thread or larger accessories m =
it
>> Adapter on smaller lens).
>> The question is, if the optical quality of the combination.
>
>
> That is what. I have a Raynox-180 ° Fisheye, the s.einer
> Camera very good, but other s.einer only moderate results =
rt.
> Seems so of the existing lens abzuhängen.
Perhaps the combination of synonymous Lens / CCD. I remember
somewhere (probably c't) have read that the "normal" lens =
e
not really normal for CCD Image sensor capable of, since =
this because of their structure (color) a nearly vertical
Require light, the standard Lenses s.Rand but a very
oblique beam angle so that the brightness to the outside edge abnim =
mt!
Recently, I read again and again but of SLR digicams, the use
Lenses allow the normal.
Josef
--
Josef Möllers (penguin keeper at FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize
- T. Pratchett
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Josef Moellers wrote:
> Perhaps the combination of synonymous Lens / CCD. I remember
Here, certainly not the lens is fixed.
> somewhere (probably c't) have read that the "normal" Lenses
> not really for normal CCD Image sensor capable of, because
> this because of their structure (color) a nearly vertical
> Require light, the standard Lenses s.Rand but a very
> oblique beam angle so that the brightness decreases towards the edge!
This is an Urban Legend.
> Recently, I read again and again but of SLR digicams, the use
> Lenses allow normal.
Even.
Antwort von Josef Moellers:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> Josef Moellers wrote:
>> somewhere (probably c't) have read that the "normal" object =
ive
>> not really for normal CCD Image sensor capable of, =
da
>> this because of their structure (color) a nearly vertical
>> Require light, the standard Lenses but a very s.Rand =
>> oblique beam angle so that the brightness to the outside edge abn =
immt!
>
>
> This is an Urban Legend.
A pity, then a nice bias against DSLRs. I hate it when =
my beautiful, long cherished prejudices of know -
be broken ;-)
Thank you,
Josef
--
Josef Möllers (penguin keeper at FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize
- T. Pratchett
Antwort von Martin Schneider:
Josef Moellers wrote:
>> This is an Urban Legend.
>
> A pity, as prejudice against a nice DSLR cameras. I hate it when
> My beautiful, long cherished prejudices of know -
> To be broken ;-)
And still synonymous with wrong. Because you can usually "analog"
Telephoto lenses easily continue s.DSLR cameras, wide angle
however, often produce much more extreme than on Randunschärfen
Analog film. And why ...? Exactly.
Gruß,
Martin
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Martin Schneider wrote:
> Josef Moellers wrote:
>>> This is an Urban Legend.
>>
>> A pity, as prejudice against a nice DSLR cameras. I hate it when
>> My beautiful, long cherished prejudices of know -
>> Be broken ;-)
>
> And still synonymous with wrong. Because you can usually "analog"
> Telephoto lenses easily continue s.DSLR cameras, wide angle
> however, often produce much more extreme than on Randunschärfen
> Analog Film. And why ...? Exactly.
Nope.
