Infoseite // Canon XH A1 vs. Panasonic HVX-200



Frage von Metallspürhund:


Strangely, I have in the search diesbezgl. can not find much, but your opinions would be so interested in me, especially since many probably will be able to say what? ;)
I would like to see an HD Cam growth and am now in these two models arrived.
My applications are mainly short documentaries and reports of trips. I am interested in doing, however, synonymous for some time the subject of "film". I realize that I have two cameras with no real film look for people, but perhaps at least approximately (?).
What are your opinions / experiences / recommendations?
Merci. Andre.

Space


Antwort von smooth-appeal:

XHA1 and 35mm adapter ...
The Panasonic users but are you sure what else to tell ;-)

Space


Antwort von r.p.television:

So just when traveling, I would you a XH A1 recommend.
With the HVX200 you either have to a dozen P2 cards to buy a laptop or permanently for free making the cards around with you like it.
The advantage of the DVC PRO HD Compression is the HVX200 through its CCDs, which are not even from SD to HD Resolutionfragwürdiges.

Mini-DV tapes are anywhere to buy and in addition a secure archiving.
For example, if I with my Van'm abroad, I store the tapes separately of my camcorder and laptop. In the event of a theft, then I usually keep the tapes (I do believe that times are a thief to be less interested). The Camera and the laptop are insured. In a HVX200 would be all gone.

The HVX200 is rather for purely scenic work, since the P2 cards for documentaries and travelogues
s.viel offer too little storage and
b) too expensive.

And anhängbare Fire gate (hard) are a much less reliable than tapes.

Space


Antwort von hauhar:

If you can cope with the drop and the heat in your camera body is not too great then it all true.

Space


Antwort von camworks:

"rptelevision" wrote:

And anhängbare Fire gate (hard) are a much less reliable than tapes.


I have exactly the opposite experience.

Space


Antwort von Tom Bola:

a comparison of both cams are there in this article:
http://www.dvxuser.com/articles/xha1/
Without the article now to have read (I've seen the pictures and footage viewed) to find the Ouput of the Panasonic much better. Beautiful contrast, perhaps sometimes a bit too "pop", but the green is at least one green. Can not help me, but the Canon looks like as if it were being hunted by a filter. So, color brilliance, contrast, freshness is the point quite clearly s.die Panasonic! My cents ..

Space


Antwort von camworks:

apart from the fact that a hearty xha1 problem with chromatic aberration (color bleeding s.kontrastkanten) has.

(but it is synonymous much cheaper than the hvx)

Space


Antwort von PowerMac:

That is one thing. I personally find the Picture of the HVX much nicer. Filmic, softer, more natural. More drawings, more contrast. The color "red" and "green" are synonymous better. Browns-mistigem about weather it copes much better than others. Also the handling is better, it has the most keys where they belong. The Canon is to me as "Fummel". With scenic Rotate is okay, if you have three hours a day verschießt material, then no more. Picture versus workflow. And the HVX has a problem with resolution, but by far not as bad as always alleged.

Space


Antwort von hauhar:

Color differences are not for me. The A1 can be adjusted as precisely as you would want to have. I like the handling of the Canon synonymous with better ... Is halt by the user depending on which system a more like it.

The real strengths of the HVX, I see in Farbsampling and the multiple frame rates and the rapid availability of the material.

For me, outweigh the benefits of the Canon anyway.

Space



Space


Antwort von smooth-appeal:

The above post is of me ... What I forgot:

The CAs are half as bad as many always do. The only thing I am really a bit disturbed, the reddish color of the Farbsaums. For most lenses, the CAs rather bluish / purple hues over.

The constantly seen on television and hardly any meckert about:-P

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"PowerMac" wrote: And the HVX has a problem with resolution, but by far not as bad as always alleged.
The unsolicited offers for penis enlargement show a need, a widespread dissatisfaction, synonymous, if they just "feel" is, - and yet not even by the user. Since the boundary is difficult to determine s.wo of pathological jealousy and instead will be an upgrade to better their own perception of a body part on other priorities would shift.

A clear case: At first glance, the HVX better pictures. The clear winner in the freestyle.

In what situation should the lower Resolutionein major disadvantage? Occupationally-related, I have a relaxed relationship relating to resolution. And although I certainly make sure the HVX itself as well as basic information about pixel numbers say nothing about a subjective impression of sharpness.

The HVX was the camera of my choice. The fact that I have not bought, was virtually s.Unterschied of 5000 ¬ (* Even those relatively few shoots footage, still needs some P2 cards) compared to the A1. This also has a number of problems, but is worth the money that it costs.

Space


Antwort von camworks:

"Axel" wrote: The HVX was the camera of my choice. The fact that I have not bought, was virtually s.Unterschied of 5000 ¬ (* Even those relatively few shoots footage, still needs some P2 cards)
now get a 160GB fire tore euro for 1600, I find much cheaper than a pack p2 cards. 720p25 fit in there more than 5 hours of video on it.

Space


Antwort von r.p.television:

"Anonymous" wrote: If you can cope with the drop and the heat in your camera body is not too great then it all true.

If on the XH A1 is related, I can not quite understand statement.
Neither, I noticed an increase in temperature, nor a Dropoutrate above the norm. More specifically, I can remember s.keinen single dropout. Synonymous but only about 6 full tapes filmed.
Since she is far more reliable than the XL H1, though I think that this is the same drive was installed.

The thing with the Fire Doors:
IF it works, it is obviously a good thing, except times like this that the camera when shooting without a tripod is already much more unwieldy.
But I have very bad experience with my Fire doors and had it returned. An outlier will probably not have been because I have such problems desöfteren heard.
Perhaps the fire doors to the HVX (because it is indeed a special Model) renewed and useful.

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Canon XH A1
XH A1: Where the receiver?
XH A1: Small Record button is stuck
XH A1 Audio MONO MIC Jack?
Conclusion XH A1 vs VX2100E
Canon XH A1 for sale
XH A1 s.TV join? Help!
canon xh a1 + = weitwinkelkonv which compendium?
My new XH A1 set correctly!
XH A1 stuttering?
Monitor XH A1
Head hours XH A1




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash