Hello everybody, have a question on the new version of the Canon xh a1, xh ss ie I know that the main difference between the two models is that the "new" model is now as synonymous Zoom sharpness simultaneously operate. I have read here in this forum that some of this feature as an essential step. What is the significance, importance and what bildgestalterischen Limitations exist with the old model. If you have an example from the practice would have would be very helpful. Thanks in advance.
Antwort von High_Tension:
If you are zooming an example could be that you with two players in the Picture searched, of which one stands behind. If you now focus on the Middle searched and the blur in the rear stands the rear, you can zoom into the center and at the same time, the focus shifted to him.
Antwort von Axel:
Search:> Vertigo Effect
But quite synonymous prosaic, the classical way, just to focus completely einzuzoomen, and then again for the recording out. It moves itself in the sharpness of the old A1 (applies to manual focus, automatic controls after).
Indispensable? Nope. But beautiful, that is resolved. It was a minus point.
What struck me as a user of a 35mm adapter would have been much more important: zoom and focus ring block, so you do not accidentally move them. If yes no problem, because now it became clear that only two mechanics vorgaukeln, but did not should be.
Antwort von Butzow:
Thank you both for the quick reply. If I have understood it correctly, then we moved to the Vertigo Effect of the object or the people filmed and zooms away in equal parts, right? But why should the old Canon is not possible, you could here but the auto-select Focus. I would also be essential that objects on which attention should be positioned by blurring waivers. Is it with the cannon xha1 possible and depends on what a good result from the ranges of Optics "Henkelcamcordern" for it or you need bigger lenses? Even if it does not belong here, do you know if the Panasonic AG-HVX201AE the simultaneous setting of zoom and sharpness would allow. Finally, it cost a little more or is the price just s.der p2 card technology? Thanks for your reply.
Antwort von High_Tension:
"Butzow" wrote:
I would also be essential that objects on which attention should be positioned by blurring waivers. Is it with the cannon xha1 possible and depends on what a good result from the ranges of Optics "Henkelcamcordern" for it or you need bigger lenses?
This low depth of field because you do depends for the most part of the Aperture from. Small aperture = small depth = the effect you want. On the other hand, it depends from the zoom. Tele = Grings depth = the effect you want. And finally, the distance is still the object of a role: Small distance = small depth of field = the effect you want. This effect is Henkel with men in any case possible, if somewhat more difficult as synonymous with the big brothers. For the HVX, I know nothing definite. I would not know that it does not work ... because at the Canon XH-A1 just rumgeschlampert.
