Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Sonybringt new AVCHD camcorders and AVCHD Vegas Update of rudi - 25 Apr 2007 21:56:00 This is something really surprising: With a further three (!) New AVCHD camcorders will Sonydemnächst-in camcorder market.
The new HDR-CX7 is the smallest and lightest AVCHD camcorder ever be. He stands up to almost 3 hours 1080i video on an 8-GB Memory Stick PRO Duo (in LP mode). Includes Battery, he remains well below 500 grams magical border. Who wants more recording capacity, the disk accesses to the HDR-SR7 models (with 60 GB HD) or HDR-SR5 (with 40 GB).
In handling, there is a new film roll index allows the user through the various scenes as a collection of thumbnail scrolling. In addition, by a facial scenes familiar faces after several criteria.
The HDR-CX7 and the HDR-SR7 has a 3-megapixel sensor and an optical Image Stabilization. The HDR-SR5 entwackelt electronical and has "only" 2-megapixels. In addition to the supplied Picture browser, announces Sonyin this one synonymous Vegas 7.0E update (synonymous for small versions) with support for AVCHD in July.
The camcorder should already be available in June and at the following prices: HDR-SR5 ($ 1100) HDR-CX7 ($ 1200) and HDR-SR7 ($ 1400).
This is an auto-generated entry
Here is the link to the news with links and images on the pages Slashcam Magazine
Antwort von Valentino:
Hilfe Ah, now revolves entirely s.Wheel But Sony is not it?
So there is of Sony soon But now more than six or AVCHD camcorder, I have yet verzählt and there are more?
Na no preference I will finally have a structural alternative to have my HC1, that the way to ever smaller and more compact just is not my thing.
The HC1/A1 is simply a great camera, not too big and not too small and synonymous of people with slightly larger hands can be served.
I find it somewhat strange that, in addition to the HVR-A1 is currently no AVCHD or HDV camera in the 2000 Euro area reserved as a proper alternative. Even the new HV20, of which I only was completely surprised, by the lack of the LANC port and focus ring for me completely useless.
There used to be synonymous but finite miniDV cameras in this price / performance segment.
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Ian:
As an owner I would HC1 me as my next one in the camera format the FX 7 wish. 3-Chip, Optical Image Stabilization, metal housing, more buttons and switches instead of menus on touch-control display and if possible with XLR phantom power.
Ian vg
Antwort von Valentino:
As an owner I would HC1 me as my next one in the camera format the FX 7 wish. 3-Chip, Optical Image Stabilization, metal housing, more buttons and switches instead of menus on touch-control display and if possible with XLR phantom power.
Ian vg Ah what a nice dream, unfortunately I think there is not really off because Sonydie two models HC5 and HC7 as official successor to the HC1 viewing. What I could imagine that it will hopefully soon be a successor to the HVR-A1 and is therefore synonymous then your XLR inputs come true, it probably is then priced at about 3000 euros.
But at the moment, I believe that not even the developers of the companies know what they really want, but AVCHD or HDV. The problem with AVCHD is simply the high computing power that can be used for the cut and the need is already in HDV risieg. The article illustrates the synonymous vs. AVCHD. HDV in the last issue of the cameraman. Panasonic says AVCHD is composed of course by Sonybehauptet AVCHD HDV for consumer and for professionals. What consumers should still imply?
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Andreas*S:
Less is more with us :-) Unfortunately, Sony is no longer in the limelight of the clientele. usein reason: many migrants are VX2100E/FX7E with the skills Lowlight disappointed.
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
For FX7 can I say nothing, but is probably VX2100e unbeaten in lowlight. Who says there is no good, have no clue or no money for it.
Antwort von Andreas*S:
Less is more with us :-) Unfortunately, Sony is no longer in the limelight of the clientele. usein reason: many migrants are VX2100E/FX7E with the skills Lowlight disappointed. So as far as I've noticed läfut in Hänldern the XH-A1 ambesten and then there comes the HVR-V1, of the FX7 were far more likely a few sold. I understand the people but not the FX7 only because the worse Lowlight behavior returned. That is, in my view, highly Sturrheit ten, because it is almost an impossibility to image converter with a light more Pixlen Stronger Picture to be expected. Yes clear the CMOS chips are not synonymous, the Lichstärksten, but who to me here in a better Picture 16:9 as the FX7 from a VX2100 herrausholen tried to overlook just between the two cameras in terms of contrast and sharpness is a quantum leap. Since then you have to halt the worst LowLight behavior in the purchase or next, as in the Stone are working with DV.
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
Yes you do see here!
How have you been saying, It is with Sony's CMOS chips do not like the FX7 is opposite the FX1 clearly at a disadvantage. (The zoom times excluded)
The VX2100 has an excellent picture, but hold only in 4:3 mode. Because she is unbeatable. In 16:9, the sharpness halt much worse. I even tested. Then I came to the FX1 although the FX7 already existed. Crucial hal were buying the 1 / 3 "CCD chips.
From the sharpness of her it makes no sense synonymous with HDV DV to compare.
And the Canon is synonymous nor a higher price category.
Antwort von Andreas*S:
Yes you do see here!
Yes thank you that you've noticed ;-)
I would not be noticed now. I do not want to compare HDV with DV but my Ausage has two cameras in DV mode on the terms or how the final results later on SD-DVD looks like.
Antwort von Andreas*S:
> Sonybehauptet AVCHD HDV for consumer and for professionals.
Huch. I have a SonySR1E and had me annoyed that I AVCHD with no handle. Then I had kuzrzzeitig a Canon HV 20 (HDV) here and have compared the pictures here: The SR1E has delivered significantly better images than the 20th AGM And I usually get no good view, but it was so overwhelmingly.
And while there were usnormale indoors during the day with good lighting.
Terra
Antwort von Jan:
Because it is synonymous to nothing so fast.
The companies have more pixels for an HD picture available - a sharp edge to be seen, 400,000 net pixel like the VX 2100 is not sufficient for HD content.
The small 1 / 3 "sensor will have the 2 million HDV no chance against a 2100 VX in light slumber.
Here the company would have probably made huge progress sensors or more sensors installed, both for the next time unwarscheinlich.
The company's superior to even higher classes even if a 2 / 3 "sensor really profitable for them, so fast, this will not - with the extremely bright HDV - with really 2-3 mio net of 1920x1080 pixels.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
Swing times the SR 1, since the HV 20 In order to better lengths, no streaks & Nachzieheffekte.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Genevare:
Yes you do see here!
Yes thank you that you've noticed ;-)
I would not be noticed now. I do not want to compare HDV with DV but my Ausage has two cameras in DV mode on the terms or how the final results later on SD-DVD looks like. The comparison you've made but, HDV is nunmal a 16:9 format and the VX2100 a 4:3 Cam. A Comparison of sharpness that is unfair.
If I even synonymous in HDV movies, heist is not the DV format is a Stone Age. So far, it is standard.
I imagine at times is a good DV cam all male is better as a bad HDV Cam. And this is particularly true for the new format with hard drive and DVD Recording
Antwort von phg:
So, then I will believe synonymous mustard on it to FX7 and Lowlight its behavior!
While the picture in very low light not very bright, but the noise is relatively low (that's what I think is far more important) than the +20 dB Gain a Canon Camera and strong noise (I have my gain on the FX7 +12 dB limited)
I still find strange that the Sonyin techn. Data for FX7 3.0 lux minimum illumination states, while in the small cams (eg, HDR-SR7) 2.0 Lux indicate?
That's odd, because both have CMOS chips and the FX7 has to have the greater Lens!
or is the quality of the smaller in the low-lux just so bad?
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
this is s.Sony. Sonyhat 2 "Lowlightprogramme".
Once a feature long exposure - about 1 / 25 second and Color Slow Shutter - something for 1/3-1/6 sec. Depending on the customer's request - Movement representation.
The companies give you the figures for Lux Night program.
Panasonic is fair because 12 Lux at 1 / 50 sec, with 2-4 Lux night program, most companies where they can cheat.
FX 7 has no program or a long exposure or even Slow shutter NightShot and that's synonymous a good thing, is their sensitivity to light without a special night program is measured.
Although I think Comparison always weak, who says the black and noisy as the Picture is at 3 lux?
Ich hab ja AGM 20 - about 20 lux (dark lager) reingestellt images, the user said "Can not you with more light make a test?"
3 lux, there is almost nothing.
VG
Jan
