Infoseite // PAL and NTSC - HDV still far apart?



Frage von Axel:


A similar thread, although there are already, but having a focus on "price gap".
Therefore, here again the question:
Apart of the frame rate (PAL 25fps/50 fields, fps/60 NTSC 30 fields) it seems that HDV footage not differ more to give.
This point would then recently s.NTSC.
If you have umkonvertieren, one has yet provided the same information Resolutionmehr with 60i, the summary would therefore have to PAL - the appropriate coder - without loss of quality be possible. But not vice versa. Yeah, I know when DV conversion causes a loss of quality in both directions, but there are indeed converted synonymous THREE parameters.
Am I wrong? Please post if you know more.

Space


Antwort von beiti:

The recently Resolutionist same. Thus, the 60-Hz version) has a total of more image information (better motion resolution. If one can independently decide which is the 60-Hz version is the better choice. (Especially with HDV is just the contrary, however, the data rate unchanged, ie with 60 Hz per frame, one has less space and have more compact. What looks better then the bottom line is, we need to test.)

A conversion to 50 Hz but is still very complicated and qualitatively unsatisfactory. At the same time in which shows the 60-Hz fields variant 6, shows the 50-Hz version 5 fields. Even with full images of such a calculation would never completely intermediate, and at the Interladed variants, there is the offset added to the fields. The bottom line will suffer from the quality, no preference in what direction.

In the PAL-NTSC conversion was the difference Resolutioneigentlich never the big problem. (Any Photoshop user knows how high you can convert Resolutions.) The real problem has always been the creation of intermediate images.

The fact remains: If you need 50 Hz should be synonymous to turn in 50 Hz. Perhaps even the ability to switch the camcorder to the long-term standard, so that we no longer different Euro-American instruments and equipment needs, but according to need between 50i, 60i, 25p, 30p or 24p can switch.

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"beiti" wrote: Especially when the HDV is opposed, however, the data rate unchanged, ie with 60 Hz per frame, one has less space and have more compact. What if the bottom line look better, we need to test.
Flaw found, thank beiti.
"beiti" wrote: Perhaps it will switch to the ability to switch the camcorder so long as standard, so that, depending on demand (...) between 50i, 60i, 25p, 30p or 24p.
I do not understand synonymous. With the Z1, I do believe you can switch to 60i. Ought to be more favorable to the Manufacturer, if they no longer have to produce two models.

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Copy of NTSC to PAL
NTSC PAL
Liquid 7.2 of PAL convert to NTSC.
NTSC or PAL 60p 50p??
Final Cut and PAL -> NTSC transfer?
Canon XH-A1 Model NTSC - PAL umnormen on!
Canon HF 100 of NTSC to PAL
PAL-NTSC-compatible material to
SonyHVR PU-Z5 PAL NTSC switchable?
Differences NTSC <=> PAL in daily use?
720/25p PAL to NTSC SD
Canon HV20 PAL + NTSC?




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash