Frage von ice1601:
I would like to see a new camcorder up, because I am used to movies, I would distinguish s.rechner like a HDV camcorder take on besides I NIGHTSHOT value (which is probably only for the sony models exist)
now I am on about whether I use the sony HDR-HC7 accept or spend more money and the HDR-HC9 suppose
My question now is worth more money really for hc9
I very often in movies music events
Antwort von ice1601:
sorry sorry my error
post would have read or HC5-hdr hdr-hc9
Antwort von raymaker:
I very often in movies music events Bingo.
Forget the HC5, which is as far as I know no Micro input. This means that the thing done. Take the HC9.
Antwort von ice1601:
na and take the two things in bild quali what?
Antwort von ice1601:
or can I become synonymous with an AVCHD cam draw the cut no longer as cumbersome
Antwort von raymaker:
AVCHD is less suitable, because it's really tough to cut. Quad-core, it should happen.
Image quality is of course a difference. They have a non-synonymous difference uneklatanten price. HC9 is better.
Antwort von ice1601:
with AVCHD, it is really so bad? I only have a 3 GHz Core 2 Duo ...
some people in the network are mine, the better it will soon intersect with the program developers only develop well-functioning solutions must, or will in the near future because nothing special to do ...
Antwort von Daigoro:
with AVCHD, it is really so bad? Yes, it is.
So after some handling tests were Internet s.Beispielfilmen aus'm AVCHD cameras died for me.
I have the HC5 for 499, - and get bought - the HC9 (/ HC7) might be better, but not so much that I 300, - would have been.
The HC5 is missing stop settings and especially the micro port (though you look at the synonymous relatively inexpensive s.den Interface Shoe can tinker with - the adapter that there's times, is no longer Zony forth).
The picture looks quite good for the price class - balanced - gefaellt me.
ps, however, I see that there's no more at Amazon for 499, and is back to 600 - and over there. The HC9's the cheapest providers already under 800, - ... hm
Antwort von ice1601:
well hang up the mic, I think need not necessarily because the videos I ever own music over it, it is always at techno events recorded in open air and indoor Now the question is just how good the HC5 in such conditions indoor record. ..
oh yes and again AVCHD:
the material can not normally expect to dv down and then cut or is already so big loss
because actually I have hd no preference I will just stop already for the future ahead
Antwort von Daigoro:
well hang up the mic, I think need not necessarily because the videos I ever own music over it, it is always at techno events recorded in open air and indoor Now the question is just how good the HC5 in such conditions indoor record. ..
Since you'll None consumer camera with a lot of lucky.
If there's no light, there's no picture.
The IR mode HC5 goes up to approximately 1-1.5 meters very well.
Or external headlamps stop lug.
oh yes and again AVCHD:
the material can not normally expect to dv down and then cut or is already so big loss
because actually I have hd no preference I will just stop already for the future ahead Computing Down to HDV cameras already on the play. The AVCHD material you have to play on the calculator and since (long) can convert.
It may be that it synonymous with AVCHD cameras scale down there, I knew not now aus'm head.
Antwort von ice1601:
na ja das convert me would not be disturbed is not that I am now every day what should be cut ... The question is whether the quality is suffering, or whether that will cut at the transitions felt ...
Antwort von ice1601:
So I did so but the sony hdr-cx6 added and must say I am not disappointed and the editing of video files is not as bad as it has always been said here is ...
