Newsmeldung von slashCAM:This is news to report with pictures and link to the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von buildyo:
In various forums could be read again and again to the Canon a finished Log & Transfer Plugin Of Glue Tools has acquired shortly before the release. Then it was silent for ever. Canon If this plugin is now available for free then that would be a very, very nice gesture and great relief. 'm Very excited.
Antwort von meawk:
Jo - may well be pretty, but I'd prefer it if you would benefit from a Firmewareupdate, where you then disconnecting the AA filter, "" could - then the Post would depart so right. . . I like to advertised plugin waived.
Unfortunately that's not really possible, I guess. Is only one solution: send in Cam and require the expansion of the filter. Let's see.
LG
Antwort von Axel:
... but I'd prefer it if you would bring a Firmewareupdate, where the AA could then disconnecting filter "... What does the filter, then? I know that it is not a euphemism for a diaper. But how would the show Alias | Wavefront Mayaing if it were not filtered out? What would be the advantage of more Alias | Wavefront Mayaing?
Antwort von Valentino:
@ meakw
The wonderful increase of the AA filter will not gain anything.
The problem of the Canon cameras is quite different:
Line-skipping and a poor choice of recording codecs.
For the intended audience of the video journalists, the quality may be sufficient. But, having earlier so synonymous with a PD170 or SD XDCAM, and filmed on DV look almost any HD picture looks much better. Films times a Siemens star with the canons, then you see how bad times are really canon.
For the ambitious videographers should be no later than end of 2010 include raw video and corresponding to the standard of RED cameras, Canon and Sonygeben.
Then we will use the Canon DSLR synonymous only for sure what they were intended, namely to take pictures.
Antwort von meawk:
Are you really sure that the cam then more Alias | Wavefront would show Mayaing, Axel - I do not. One thing is certain: Filters out - a lot more sharpness. . . more brutally s.Schärfe in the details
MM to the AA filter is one of the last "manipulation possibilities" at the present time for the Manufacturer, so the more expensive Cam's show just a tad bit better picture quality. Think that might be a synonymous of thinner filter, etc. here work wonders.
Have time a camera tuner contacted the filter, it expands and may be replaced with another. I'm curious to see what comes out there. The cost for such "tuning" are fairly cheap - so about 150 to 300 dollars.
If I am not mistaken, the M9 has no AA filter - or?
LG
Antwort von Valentino:
The muddy video image of the Canon is not s.AA filter, or the still images the camera would not be as sharp and able to resolve about 80 percent of the pixel resolution.
The 20 Porzent lost but not by the AA filter, but by the De-Bayering.
No idea who's this nonsense with the AA filter has told (probably the camera tuner who wants to earn 300euro).
A good friend of me just write his master's thesis in "Media and Imaging Technology" on various camera systems and according to its results as the Canon delivers a bad picture because of the Line-skipping/H.264 (with 4:2:0) and not because of the AA filter.
At the same synonymous get the technicians of the canons synonymous RED have taken a little closer under the microscope.
