Infoseite // Edius Broadcast vs.. Final Cut Pro



Frage von der Schneider:


Dear People,

as a newcomer here in the forum, I would like a certain popular times to ask to get rid of assessment:

I want a new section to purchase space and wrote a budget of around 8000 ¬.

There is great emphasis on P2 material to be rotated but of course synonymous dv.

I cut for years with Edius 2.5 and have the Edius workflow own love.
previous reports speak for Edius in the broadcast version of Good kompatiilität hd with many sources, good real-time capability and own the Canopus HD codec.

Final Cut Pro has been clearly the better known of what happens in the customer acquisition play a role and it seems that "professional" to be.

comparative wär to make between a:

Mac Pro 8-Core 3.2 Ghz
8 GB RAM / NVIDIA 8800 GT HD 512MB/500GB
Final Cut Studio 2
Blackmagic DeckLink HD Extreme
new model with HDMI and IO 2K
2 Apple 23 "Cinema HD Display
3 terabytes of additional internal memory
(3 * 1000GB)
about 7600 ¬ (dieAgenten.de)

and a PC:
8x Xeon 3.00 GHz
12GBDDR II RAM, Quadro channel with 4x 800MHz
512MB Quadro QFX3700
ProTools LE 7.4
250GB SATA II-300
4TB RAID 10
Edius SP / HDV
8000 ¬ (inside multimedia)

I would be more than estimates, opinions and alternative synonymous thanks in advance.

Space


Antwort von weitwinkel:

I work very pleased with Edius pro (not broadcast) but would
in your case to hire to Final Cut Pro, tend, as a mac book pro thee synonymous
p2 on the persuasive prima processed ... I trust in Edius
variant of the laptop is not so much.
gruß cj

Space


Antwort von PowerMac:

Final Cut is an industry standard!

Space


Antwort von der Schneider:

I am aware of the Final Cut Pro is a art industry standard is.
I feel for the overall workflow and the performance under the aspect of cost.
I suspect that I am part of the money for Final Cut Pro to simply pay that Final Cut Pro.

I have the experience that Edius has great features to me as a good cutter and help think that the broadcast version schnitprogramm as Final Cut Pro as well.
but I do not know.

I also know I am with apple just does not look and it seems that the systems are not so easily be upgraded.

maybe there are still a few thoughts on the subject ...

Space


Antwort von PowerMac:

Edius is equally good? There are various tests and comparisons between Edius and Final Cut Pro, which should convince you.

Space


Antwort von der Schneider:

@ Powermac
Could you link to so-NEN nem test indicate? That would be very enlightening ..

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Schneider" wrote: ... I suspect that I am part of the money for Final Cut Pro to simply pay that Final Cut Pro is ...
To a certain extent this may be - as with many other brands synonymous - even vote, but the reason for the probably around 400 euros extra cost compared to Edius, I see more is that you with an entire FCS program package including Soundtrack, Motion, Color, etc. get . Edius, I know too little to even be able to compare, but look at s.besten times at exactly what you are in FCS and get Edius. From the price-performance ratio is currently first in my opinion unbeatable.

Gruß Bernd E.

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Final Cut Pro 7 - External Tone asynchronous to the image
Final Cut Pro 7 to Final Cur Pro X
Question for Final Cut Pro update 5:04
Transitions in Final Cut Pro - always "poor content"
Rumors around Apple's next explosion Final Cut Pro
Different FPS in Final Cut Pro
Next Final Cut Pro version presented to selected audiences
Lamination of Fussler on Lens in Final Cut Pro
Final Cut Pro 7 will not install
Final Cut Pro Round Clip in Clip
Final Cut Pro "loses" media -> Connect new?
Proper export from Final Cut Pro 7.0




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash